TODO:
1. Update Documentation/contributor-guide/modules.svg;
2. Update bill-of-materials.json when raft and raftexample are removed in future;
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
Executed commands below,
1. Removed go.etcd.io/raft/v3 => ../raft;
2. go get go.etcd.io/raft/v3@eaa6808e1f7ab2247c13778250f70520b0527ff1
3. go mod tidy
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
When two members in a 5 member cluster are corrupted, and they
have different hashes, etcd will raise alarm for both members,
but the order isn't guaranteed. But if the two corrupted members
have the same hash, then the order is guaranteed. The leader
always raise alarm in the same order as the member list.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
If quorum doesn't exist, we don't know which members data are
corrupted. In such situation, we intentionally set the memberID
as 0, it means it affects the whole cluster.
It's align with what we did for 3.4 and 3.5 in
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/14849
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
When the leader detects data inconsistency by comparing hashes,
currently it assumes that the follower is the corrupted member.
It isn't correct, the leader might be the corrupted member as well.
We should depend on quorum to identify the corrupted member.
For example, for 3 member cluster, if 2 members have the same hash,
the the member with different hash is the corrupted one. For 5 member
cluster, if 3 members have the same same, the corrupted member is one
of the left two members; it's also possible that both the left members
are corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
Comments fixed as per goword in go test files that shell
function go_srcs_in_module lists as per changes on #14827
Helps in #14827
Signed-off-by: Bhargav Ravuri <bhargav.ravuri@infracloud.io>
1. Fixed the test failures which are caused by recent test framework rafactoring;
2. renamed the file to promote_experimental_flag_test.go.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
--warning-unary-request-duration is a duplicate of --experimental-warning-unary-request-duration
experimental-warning-unary-request-duration will be removed in v3.7.
fixes https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/13783
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Kanivets <bkanivets@apple.com>
`unsafeCommit` is called by both `(*batchTxBuffered) commit` and
`(*backend) defrag`. When users perform the defragmentation
operation, etcd doesn't update the consistent index. If etcd
crashes(e.g. panicking) in the process for whatever reason, then
etcd replays the WAL entries starting from the latest snapshot,
accordingly it may re-apply entries which might have already been
applied, eventually the revision isn't consistent with other members.
Refer to discussion in https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/14685
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
This commit makes the rarely used `raftpb.Message.Snapshot` field nullable.
In doing so, it reduces the memory size of a `raftpb.Message` message from
264 bytes to 128 bytes — a 52% reduction in size.
While this commit does not change the protobuf encoding, it does change
how that encoding is used. `(gogoproto.nullable) = false` instruct the
generated proto marshaling logic to always encode a value for the field,
even if that value is empty. `(gogoproto.nullable) = true` instructs the
generated proto marshaling logic to omit an encoded value for the field
if the field is nil.
This raises compatibility concerns in both directions. Messages encoded
by new binary versions without a `Snapshot` field will be decoded as an
empty field by old binary versions. In other words, old binary versions
can't tell the difference. However, messages encoded by old binary versions
with an empty Snapshot field will be decoded as a non-nil, empty field by
new binary versions. As a result, new binary versions need to be prepared
to handle such messages.
While Message.Snapshot is not intentionally part of the external interface
of this library, it was possible for users of the library to access it and
manipulate it. As such, this change may be considered a breaking change.
Signed-off-by: Nathan VanBenschoten <nvanbenschoten@gmail.com>
All maintenance APIs require admin privilege when auth is enabled,
otherwise, the request will be rejected. If auth isn't enabled,
then no such requirement any more.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
