There exist the possiblity to update attributes of removed member in
reasonable workflow:
1. start member A
2. leader receives the proposal to remove member A
2. member A sends the proposal of update its attribute to the leader
3. leader commits the two proposals
So etcdserver should allow to update attributes of removed member.
After this PR, only cluster's interface Cluster is exposed, which makes
code much cleaner. And it avoids external packages to rely on cluster
struct in the future.
The PR extracts types.Cluster from etcdserver.Cluster. types.Cluster
is used for flag parsing and etcdserver config.
There is no need to expose etcdserver.Cluster public, which contains
lots of etcdserver internal details and methods. This is the first step
for it.
1. Persist the cluster version change through raft. When the member is restarted, it can recover
the previous known decided cluster version.
2. When there is a new leader, it is forced to do a version checking immediately. This helps to
update the first cluster version fast.
Users might want to update the peerurl of the etcd member in several cases.
For example, if the IP address of the physical machine etcd running on is
changed, user need to update the adversite-pee-rurl accordingly.
This commit makes etcd support updating the advertise-peer-url of its members.
This creates a simple ID type (wrapped around uint64) to provide for
standard serialization/deserialization to a string (i.e. base 16
encoded). This replaces strutil so now that package is removed.
Removes the notion of name being anything more than advisory or
command-line grouping, and adds checks for bootstrapping the command
line. IDs are consistent if the URLs are consistent.
This introduces two new concepts: the cluster and the member.
Members are logical etcd instances that have a name, raft ID, and a list
of peer and client addresses.
A cluster is made up of a list of members.
