Merge branch 'dd/format-patch-rfc-updates'
"git format-patch --rfc --subject-prefix=<foo>" used to ignore the "--subject-prefix" option and used "[RFC PATCH]"; now we will add "RFC" prefix to whatever subject prefix is specified. This is a backward compatible change that may deserve a note. * dd/format-patch-rfc-updates: format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix sets
This commit is contained in:
@ -1480,17 +1480,14 @@ static int subject_prefix = 0;
|
||||
static int subject_prefix_callback(const struct option *opt, const char *arg,
|
||||
int unset)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON_OPT_NEG(unset);
|
||||
subject_prefix = 1;
|
||||
((struct rev_info *)opt->value)->subject_prefix = arg;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
struct strbuf *sprefix;
|
||||
|
||||
static int rfc_callback(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON_OPT_NEG(unset);
|
||||
BUG_ON_OPT_ARG(arg);
|
||||
return subject_prefix_callback(opt, "RFC PATCH", unset);
|
||||
sprefix = opt->value;
|
||||
subject_prefix = 1;
|
||||
strbuf_reset(sprefix);
|
||||
strbuf_addstr(sprefix, arg);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int numbered_cmdline_opt = 0;
|
||||
@ -1920,6 +1917,7 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
|
||||
struct strbuf rdiff_title = STRBUF_INIT;
|
||||
struct strbuf sprefix = STRBUF_INIT;
|
||||
int creation_factor = -1;
|
||||
int rfc = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
const struct option builtin_format_patch_options[] = {
|
||||
OPT_CALLBACK_F('n', "numbered", &numbered, NULL,
|
||||
@ -1943,15 +1941,13 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
|
||||
N_("mark the series as Nth re-roll")),
|
||||
OPT_INTEGER(0, "filename-max-length", &fmt_patch_name_max,
|
||||
N_("max length of output filename")),
|
||||
OPT_CALLBACK_F(0, "rfc", &rev, NULL,
|
||||
N_("use [RFC PATCH] instead of [PATCH]"),
|
||||
PARSE_OPT_NOARG | PARSE_OPT_NONEG, rfc_callback),
|
||||
OPT_BOOL(0, "rfc", &rfc, N_("use [RFC PATCH] instead of [PATCH]")),
|
||||
OPT_STRING(0, "cover-from-description", &cover_from_description_arg,
|
||||
N_("cover-from-description-mode"),
|
||||
N_("generate parts of a cover letter based on a branch's description")),
|
||||
OPT_FILENAME(0, "description-file", &description_file,
|
||||
N_("use branch description from file")),
|
||||
OPT_CALLBACK_F(0, "subject-prefix", &rev, N_("prefix"),
|
||||
OPT_CALLBACK_F(0, "subject-prefix", &sprefix, N_("prefix"),
|
||||
N_("use [<prefix>] instead of [PATCH]"),
|
||||
PARSE_OPT_NONEG, subject_prefix_callback),
|
||||
OPT_CALLBACK_F('o', "output-directory", &output_directory,
|
||||
@ -2031,11 +2027,11 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
|
||||
rev.max_parents = 1;
|
||||
rev.diffopt.flags.recursive = 1;
|
||||
rev.diffopt.no_free = 1;
|
||||
rev.subject_prefix = fmt_patch_subject_prefix;
|
||||
memset(&s_r_opt, 0, sizeof(s_r_opt));
|
||||
s_r_opt.def = "HEAD";
|
||||
s_r_opt.revarg_opt = REVARG_COMMITTISH;
|
||||
|
||||
strbuf_addstr(&sprefix, fmt_patch_subject_prefix);
|
||||
if (format_no_prefix)
|
||||
diff_set_noprefix(&rev.diffopt);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2063,13 +2059,16 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
|
||||
if (cover_from_description_arg)
|
||||
cover_from_description_mode = parse_cover_from_description(cover_from_description_arg);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rfc)
|
||||
strbuf_insertstr(&sprefix, 0, "RFC ");
|
||||
|
||||
if (reroll_count) {
|
||||
strbuf_addf(&sprefix, "%s v%s",
|
||||
rev.subject_prefix, reroll_count);
|
||||
strbuf_addf(&sprefix, " v%s", reroll_count);
|
||||
rev.reroll_count = reroll_count;
|
||||
rev.subject_prefix = sprefix.buf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rev.subject_prefix = sprefix.buf;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < extra_hdr.nr; i++) {
|
||||
strbuf_addstr(&buf, extra_hdr.items[i].string);
|
||||
strbuf_addch(&buf, '\n');
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user