fetch: describe new refs based on where it came from

update_local_ref() used to say "[new branch]" when we stored a new ref
outside refs/tags/ hierarchy, but the message is more about what we
fetched, so use the refname at the origin to make that decision.

Also, only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/.

Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marc Branchaud
2012-04-16 18:08:50 -04:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 6da618d5c2
commit 0997adaa74
2 changed files with 41 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -294,16 +294,24 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
const char *msg;
const char *what;
int r;
if (!strncmp(ref->name, "refs/tags/", 10)) {
/*
* Nicely describe the new ref we're fetching.
* Base this on the remote's ref name, as it's
* more likely to follow a standard layout.
*/
const char *name = remote_ref ? remote_ref->name : "";
if (!prefixcmp(name, "refs/tags/")) {
msg = "storing tag";
what = _("[new tag]");
}
else {
} else if (!prefixcmp(name, "refs/heads/")) {
msg = "storing head";
what = _("[new branch]");
if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
(recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
check_for_new_submodule_commits(ref->new_sha1);
} else {
msg = "storing ref";
what = _("[new ref]");
}
r = s_update_ref(msg, ref, 0);