comments: avoid using the gender of our users
We generally avoid specifying the gender of our users in order to be more inclusive, but sometimes a few slip by due to habit. Since by doing a little bit of rewording we can avoid this irrelevant detail, let's do so. Inspired-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
69b3367f6c
commit
0e20b229ee
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct pathspec {
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A similar process is applied when a new pathspec magic is added. The designer
|
||||
* lifts the GUARD_PATHSPEC restriction in the functions that support the new
|
||||
* magic. At the same time (s)he has to make sure this new feature will be
|
||||
* magic while at the same time making sure this new feature will be
|
||||
* caught at parse_pathspec() in commands that cannot handle the new magic in
|
||||
* some cases. grepping parse_pathspec() should help.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user