use write_str_in_full helper to avoid literal string lengths

In 2d14d65 (Use a clearer style to issue commands to remote helpers,
2009-09-03) I happened to notice two changes like this:

-	write_in_full(helper->in, "list\n", 5);
+
+	strbuf_addstr(&buf, "list\n");
+	write_in_full(helper->in, buf.buf, buf.len);
+	strbuf_reset(&buf);

IMHO, it would be better to define a new function,

    static inline ssize_t write_str_in_full(int fd, const char *str)
    {
           return write_in_full(fd, str, strlen(str));
    }

and then use it like this:

-       strbuf_addstr(&buf, "list\n");
-       write_in_full(helper->in, buf.buf, buf.len);
-       strbuf_reset(&buf);
+       write_str_in_full(helper->in, "list\n");

Thus not requiring the added allocation, and still avoiding
the maintenance risk of literal string lengths.
These days, compilers are good enough that strlen("literal")
imposes no run-time cost.

Transformed via this:

    perl -pi -e \
        's/write_in_full\((.*?), (".*?"), \d+\)/write_str_in_full($1, $2)/'\
      $(git grep -l 'write_in_full.*"')

Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

upload-pack.c

@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void)
 
 	shallow_nr = 0;
 	if (debug_fd)
-		write_in_full(debug_fd, "#S\n", 3);
+		write_str_in_full(debug_fd, "#S\n");
 	for (;;) {
 		struct object *o;
 		unsigned char sha1_buf[20];
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void)
 		}
 	}
 	if (debug_fd)
-		write_in_full(debug_fd, "#E\n", 3);
+		write_str_in_full(debug_fd, "#E\n");
 
 	if (!use_sideband && daemon_mode)
 		no_progress = 1;