Documentation: avoid poor-man's small caps GIT

In the earlier days, we used to spell the name of the system as GIT,
to simulate as if it were typeset with capital G and IT in small
caps.  Later we stopped doing so at around 1.6.5 days.

Let's stop doing so throughout the documentation.  The name to refer
to the whole system (and the concept it embodies) is "Git"; the
command end-users type is "git".  And document this in the coding
guideline.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Ackermann
2013-01-21 20:16:20 +01:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent fe73786b48
commit 48a8c26c62
28 changed files with 53 additions and 48 deletions

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: sending changesets from the middle of a git tree
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:37:39 -0700
Abstract: In this article, JC talks about how he rebases the
public "pu" branch using the core GIT tools when he updates
public "pu" branch using the core Git tools when he updates
the "master" branch, and how "rebase" works. Also discussed
is how this applies to individual developers who sends patches
upstream.
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ up. With its basing philosophical ancestry on quilt, this is
the kind of task StGIT is designed to do.
I just have done a simpler one, this time using only the core
GIT tools.
Git tools.
I had a handful of commits that were ahead of master in pu, and I
wanted to add some documentation bypassing my usual habit of
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ you ran fsck-cache, which is normal. After testing "pu", you
can run "git prune" to get rid of those original three commits.
While I am talking about "git rebase", I should talk about how
to do cherrypicking using only the core GIT tools.
to do cherrypicking using only the core Git tools.
Let's go back to the earlier picture, with different labels.

View File

@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ How to revert an existing commit
================================
One of the changes I pulled into the 'master' branch turns out to
break building GIT with GCC 2.95. While they were well intentioned
break building Git with GCC 2.95. While they were well intentioned
portability fixes, keeping things working with gcc-2.95 was also
important. Here is what I did to revert the change in the 'master'
branch and to adjust the 'pu' branch, using core GIT tools and
branch and to adjust the 'pu' branch, using core Git tools and
barebone Porcelain.
First, prepare a throw-away branch in case I screw things up.

View File

@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ In effect, this means you're going to be root, or that you're using a
preconfigured WebDAV server.
Step 1: setup a bare GIT repository
Step 1: setup a bare Git repository
-----------------------------------
At the time of writing, git-http-push cannot remotely create a GIT
At the time of writing, git-http-push cannot remotely create a Git
repository. So we have to do that at the server side with git. Another
option is to generate an empty bare repository at the client and copy
it to the server with a WebDAV client (which is the only option if Git