sha1_loose_object_info(): do not return success on missing object

Since 052fe5ea (sha1_loose_object_info: make type lookup optional,
2013-07-12), sha1_loose_object_info() returns happily without
checking if the object in question exists, which is not what the the
caller sha1_object_info_extended() expects; the caller does not even
bother checking the existence of the object itself.

Noticed-by: Sven Brauch <svenbrauch@googlemail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano
2013-11-06 10:00:57 -08:00
parent d619cfc749
commit 4ef8d1dd03
2 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -2413,15 +2413,18 @@ static int sha1_loose_object_info(const unsigned char *sha1,
/* /*
* If we don't care about type or size, then we don't * If we don't care about type or size, then we don't
* need to look inside the object at all. * need to look inside the object at all. Note that we
* do not optimize out the stat call, even if the
* caller doesn't care about the disk-size, since our
* return value implicitly indicates whether the
* object even exists.
*/ */
if (!oi->typep && !oi->sizep) { if (!oi->typep && !oi->sizep) {
if (oi->disk_sizep) { struct stat st;
struct stat st; if (stat_sha1_file(sha1, &st) < 0)
if (stat_sha1_file(sha1, &st) < 0) return -1;
return -1; if (oi->disk_sizep)
*oi->disk_sizep = st.st_size; *oi->disk_sizep = st.st_size;
}
return 0; return 0;
} }

View File

@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ test_expect_success "--batch-check for an emtpy line" '
test " missing" = "$(echo | git cat-file --batch-check)" test " missing" = "$(echo | git cat-file --batch-check)"
' '
test_expect_success 'empty --batch-check notices missing object' '
echo "$_z40 missing" >expect &&
echo "$_z40" | git cat-file --batch-check="" >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
batch_input="$hello_sha1 batch_input="$hello_sha1
$commit_sha1 $commit_sha1
$tag_sha1 $tag_sha1