fsck-objects: do not segfault on missing tree in cache-tree
Even if trees are missing in cache-tree, we should continue and check the rest of the object database. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:
@ -446,6 +446,11 @@ static int fsck_cache_tree(struct cache_tree *it)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (0 <= it->entry_count) {
|
if (0 <= it->entry_count) {
|
||||||
struct object *obj = parse_object(it->sha1);
|
struct object *obj = parse_object(it->sha1);
|
||||||
|
if (!obj) {
|
||||||
|
error("%s: invalid sha1 pointer in cache-tree",
|
||||||
|
sha1_to_hex(it->sha1));
|
||||||
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
mark_reachable(obj, REACHABLE);
|
mark_reachable(obj, REACHABLE);
|
||||||
obj->used = 1;
|
obj->used = 1;
|
||||||
if (obj->type != tree_type)
|
if (obj->type != tree_type)
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user