commit-graph: fix ordering bug in generation numbers

When computing the generation numbers for a commit-graph, we compute
the corrected commit dates and then check if their offsets from the
actual dates is too large to fit in the 32-bit Generation Data chunk.
However, there is a problem with this approach: if we have parsed the
generation data from the previous commit-graph, then we continue the
loop because the corrected commit date is already computed. This causes
an under-count in the number of overflow values.

It is incorrect to add an increment to num_generation_data_overflows
next to this 'continue' statement, because we might start
double-counting commits that are computed because of the depth-first
search walk from a commit with an earlier OID.

Instead, iterate over the full commit list at the end, checking the
offsets to see how many grow beyond the maximum value.

Create a new t5328-commit-graph-64-bit-time.sh test script to handle
special cases of testing 64-bit timestamps. This helps demonstrate this
bug in more cases. It still won't hit all potential cases until the next
change, which reenables reading generation numbers. Use the skip_all
trick from 0a2bfccb9c (t0051: use "skip_all" under !MINGW in
single-test file, 2022-02-04) to make the output clean when run on a
32-bit system.

Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

t/t5318-commit-graph.sh

@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ test_expect_success 'warn on improper hash version' '
 	)
 '
 
-test_expect_success 'lower layers have overflow chunk' '
+test_expect_success TIME_IS_64BIT,TIME_T_IS_64BIT 'lower layers have overflow chunk' '
 	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
 	UNIX_EPOCH_ZERO="@0 +0000" &&
-	FUTURE_DATE="@2147483646 +0000" &&
+	FUTURE_DATE="@4147483646 +0000" &&
 	rm -f .git/objects/info/commit-graph &&
 	test_commit --date "$FUTURE_DATE" future-1 &&
 	test_commit --date "$UNIX_EPOCH_ZERO" old-1 &&