mirrors/git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

run-command API: have "run_processes_parallel{,_tr2}()" return void

Browse Source 
Change the "run_processes_parallel{,_tr2}()" functions to return void,
instead of int. Ever since c553c72eed (run-command: add an
asynchronous parallel child processor, 2015-12-15) they have
unconditionally returned 0.

To get a "real" return value out of this function the caller needs to
get it via the "task_finished_fn" callback, see the example in hook.c
added in 96e7225b31 (hook: add 'run' subcommand, 2021-12-22).

So the "result = " and "if (!result)" code added to "builtin/fetch.c"
d54dea77db (fetch: let --jobs=<n> parallelize --multiple, too,
2019-10-05) has always been redundant, we always took that "if"
path. Likewise the "ret =" in "t/helper/test-run-command.c" added in
be5d88e112 (test-tool run-command: learn to run (parts of) the
testsuite, 2019-10-04) wasn't used, instead we got the return value
from the "if (suite.failed.nr > 0)" block seen in the context.

Subsequent commits will alter this API interface, getting rid of this
always-zero return value makes it easier to understand those changes.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-12 23:02:21 +02:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent a083f94c21
commit 7dd5762d9f
4 changed files with 34 additions and 40 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
run-command.c
View File

@ -1783,11 +1783,11 @@ static int pp_collect_finished(struct parallel_processes *pp)
return result;
}
int run_processes_parallel(int n,
get_next_task_fn get_next_task,
start_failure_fn start_failure,
task_finished_fn task_finished,
void *pp_cb)
void run_processes_parallel(int n,
get_next_task_fn get_next_task,
start_failure_fn start_failure,
task_finished_fn task_finished,
void *pp_cb)
{
int i, code;
int output_timeout = 100;
@ -1834,25 +1834,20 @@ int run_processes_parallel(int n,
}
pp_cleanup(&pp);
return 0;
}
int run_processes_parallel_tr2(int n, get_next_task_fn get_next_task,
start_failure_fn start_failure,
task_finished_fn task_finished, void *pp_cb,
const char *tr2_category, const char *tr2_label)
void run_processes_parallel_tr2(int n, get_next_task_fn get_next_task,
start_failure_fn start_failure,
task_finished_fn task_finished, void *pp_cb,
const char *tr2_category, const char *tr2_label)
{
int result;
trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d",
((n < 1) ? online_cpus() : n));
result = run_processes_parallel(n, get_next_task, start_failure,
task_finished, pp_cb);
run_processes_parallel(n, get_next_task, start_failure,
task_finished, pp_cb);
trace2_region_leave(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL);
return result;
}
int run_auto_maintenance(int quiet)