chainlint.pl: don't flag broken &&-chain if failure indicated explicitly

There are quite a few tests which print an error messages and then
explicitly signal failure with `false`, `return 1`, or `exit 1` as the
final command in an `if` branch. In these cases, the tests don't bother
maintaining the &&-chain between `echo` and the explicit "test failed"
indicator. Since such constructs are manually signaling failure, their
&&-chain breakage is legitimate and safe -- both for the command
immediately preceding `false`, `return`, or `exit`, as well as for all
preceding commands in the `if` branch. Therefore, stop flagging &&-chain
breakage in these sorts of cases.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

t/chainlint/chain-break-false.expect

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+if condition not satisified
+then
+	echo it did not work...
+	echo failed!
+	false
+else
+	echo it went okay ?!AMP?!
+	congratulate user
+fi

t/chainlint/chain-break-false.test

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "false" signals failure
+if condition not satisified
+then
+	echo it did not work...
+	echo failed!
+	false
+else
+	echo it went okay
+	congratulate user
+fi

t/chainlint/chain-break-return-exit.expect

@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+case "$(git ls-files)" in
+one ) echo pass one ;;
+* ) echo bad one ; return 1 ;;
+esac &&
+(
+	case "$(git ls-files)" in
+	two ) echo pass two ;;
+	* ) echo bad two ; exit 1 ;;
+esac
+) &&
+case "$(git ls-files)" in
+dir/two"$LF"one ) echo pass both ;;
+* ) echo bad ; return 1 ;;
+esac &&
+
 for i in 1 2 3 4 ; do
 	git checkout main -b $i || return $?
 	test_commit $i $i $i tag$i || return $?

t/chainlint/chain-break-return-exit.test

@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+case "$(git ls-files)" in
+one) echo pass one ;;
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return 1" signals failuire
+*) echo bad one; return 1 ;;
+esac &&
+(
+	case "$(git ls-files)" in
+	two) echo pass two ;;
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "exit 1" signals failuire
+	*) echo bad two; exit 1 ;;
+	esac
+) &&
+case "$(git ls-files)" in
+dir/two"$LF"one) echo pass both ;;
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return 1" signals failuire
+*) echo bad; return 1 ;;
+esac &&
+
 for i in 1 2 3 4 ; do
 # LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return $?" signals failure
 	git checkout main -b $i || return $?

t/chainlint/if-in-loop.expect

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 	do
 		if false
 		then
-			echo "err" ?!AMP?!
+			echo "err"
 			exit 1
 		fi ?!AMP?!
 		foo

t/chainlint/if-in-loop.test

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 	do
 		if false
 		then
-# LINT: missing "&&" on "echo"
+# LINT: missing "&&" on "echo" okay since "exit 1" signals error explicitly
 			echo "err"
 			exit 1
 # LINT: missing "&&" on "fi"