lockfile: do not rollback lock on failed close
Since the lockfile code is based on the tempfile code, it has some of the same problems, including that close_lock_file() erases the tempfile's filename buf, making it hard for the caller to write a good error message. In practice this comes up less for lockfiles than for straight tempfiles, since we usually just report the refname. But there is at least one buggy case in write_ref_to_lockfile(). Besides, given the coupling between the lockfile and tempfile modules, it's less confusing if their close() functions have the same semantics. Just as the previous commit did for close_tempfile(), let's teach close_lock_file() and its wrapper close_ref() not to rollback on error. And just as before, we'll give them new "gently" names to catch any new callers that are added. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
49bd0fc222
commit
83a3069a38
@ -545,8 +545,9 @@ int packed_refs_lock(struct ref_store *ref_store, int flags, struct strbuf *err)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (close_lock_file(&refs->lock)) {
|
||||
if (close_lock_file_gently(&refs->lock)) {
|
||||
strbuf_addf(err, "unable to close %s: %s", refs->path, strerror(errno));
|
||||
rollback_lock_file(&refs->lock);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user