Merge branch 'js/plug-leaks'

Fix memory leaks pointed out by Coverity (and people).

* js/plug-leaks: (26 commits)
  checkout: fix memory leak
  submodule_uses_worktrees(): plug memory leak
  show_worktree(): plug memory leak
  name-rev: avoid leaking memory in the `deref` case
  remote: plug memory leak in match_explicit()
  add_reflog_for_walk: avoid memory leak
  shallow: avoid memory leak
  line-log: avoid memory leak
  receive-pack: plug memory leak in update()
  fast-export: avoid leaking memory in handle_tag()
  mktree: plug memory leaks reported by Coverity
  pack-redundant: plug memory leak
  setup_discovered_git_dir(): plug memory leak
  setup_bare_git_dir(): help static analysis
  split_commit_in_progress(): simplify & fix memory leak
  checkout: fix memory leak
  cat-file: fix memory leak
  mailinfo & mailsplit: check for EOF while parsing
  status: close file descriptor after reading git-rebase-todo
  difftool: address a couple of resource/memory leaks
  ...
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano
2017-05-29 12:34:44 +09:00
23 changed files with 149 additions and 64 deletions

View File

@ -235,22 +235,24 @@ static int checkout_merged(int pos, const struct checkout *state)
/*
* NEEDSWORK:
* There is absolutely no reason to write this as a blob object
* and create a phony cache entry just to leak. This hack is
* primarily to get to the write_entry() machinery that massages
* the contents to work-tree format and writes out which only
* allows it for a cache entry. The code in write_entry() needs
* to be refactored to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode>
* instead of a cache entry. Such a refactoring would help
* merge_recursive as well (it also writes the merge result to the
* object database even when it may contain conflicts).
* and create a phony cache entry. This hack is primarily to get
* to the write_entry() machinery that massages the contents to
* work-tree format and writes out which only allows it for a
* cache entry. The code in write_entry() needs to be refactored
* to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode> instead of a cache
* entry. Such a refactoring would help merge_recursive as well
* (it also writes the merge result to the object database even
* when it may contain conflicts).
*/
if (write_sha1_file(result_buf.ptr, result_buf.size,
blob_type, oid.hash))
die(_("Unable to add merge result for '%s'"), path);
free(result_buf.ptr);
ce = make_cache_entry(mode, oid.hash, path, 2, 0);
if (!ce)
die(_("make_cache_entry failed for path '%s'"), path);
status = checkout_entry(ce, state, NULL);
free(ce);
return status;
}