Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.

This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable.  This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities.  "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Pavel Roskin
2006-07-10 02:57:51 -04:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 82e5a82fd7
commit a9486b02ec
10 changed files with 33 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@ -14,14 +14,15 @@
#include "delta.h"
#include "builtin.h"
// --check turns on checking that the working tree matches the
// files that are being modified, but doesn't apply the patch
// --stat does just a diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
// --numstat does numeric diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
// --index-info shows the old and new index info for paths if available.
// --index updates the cache as well.
// --cached updates only the cache without ever touching the working tree.
//
/*
* --check turns on checking that the working tree matches the
* files that are being modified, but doesn't apply the patch
* --stat does just a diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
* --numstat does numeric diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
* --index-info shows the old and new index info for paths if available.
* --index updates the cache as well.
* --cached updates only the cache without ever touching the working tree.
*/
static const char *prefix;
static int prefix_length = -1;
static int newfd = -1;
@ -284,8 +285,8 @@ static void parse_traditional_patch(const char *first, const char *second, struc
{
char *name;
first += 4; // skip "--- "
second += 4; // skip "+++ "
first += 4; /* skip "--- " */
second += 4; /* skip "+++ " */
if (is_dev_null(first)) {
patch->is_new = 1;
patch->is_delete = 0;