Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.

This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable.  This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities.  "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Pavel Roskin
2006-07-10 02:57:51 -04:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 82e5a82fd7
commit a9486b02ec
10 changed files with 33 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int setup_index(struct alt_base *repo, unsigned char *sha1)
{
struct packed_git *new_pack;
if (has_pack_file(sha1))
return 0; // don't list this as something we can get
return 0; /* don't list this as something we can get */
if (fetch_index(repo, sha1))
return -1;
@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static void process_alternates_response(void *callback_data)
base[serverlen - 1] != '/');
i += 3;
}
// If the server got removed, give up.
/* If the server got removed, give up. */
okay = strchr(base, ':') - base + 3 <
serverlen;
} else if (alt_req->http_specific) {
@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void process_alternates_response(void *callback_data)
okay = 1;
}
}
// skip 'objects' at end
/* skip 'objects' at end */
if (okay) {
target = xmalloc(serverlen + posn - i - 6);
strlcpy(target, base, serverlen);