Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.
This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the code more portable. This also simplifies checking for other potential incompatibilities. "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error. Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
82e5a82fd7
commit
a9486b02ec
5
mktag.c
5
mktag.c
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
|
||||
* in that size, you're doing something wrong.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// Some random size
|
||||
/* Some random size */
|
||||
#define MAXSIZE (8192)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
die("could not read from stdin");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify it for some basic sanity: it needs to start with "object <sha1>\ntype\ntagger "
|
||||
/* Verify it for some basic sanity: it needs to start with
|
||||
"object <sha1>\ntype\ntagger " */
|
||||
if (verify_tag(buffer, size) < 0)
|
||||
die("invalid tag signature file");
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user