revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing

Most of the existing codepaths were meant to treat missing uninteresting
objects to be a silently ignored non-error, but there were a few places
in handle_commit() and add_parents_to_list(), which are two key functions
in the revision traversal machinery, that cared:

 - When a tag refers to an object that we do not have, we barfed.  We
   ignore such a tag if it is painted as UNINTERESTING with this change.

 - When digging deeper into the ancestry chain of a commit that is already
   painted as UNINTERESTING, in order to paint its parents UNINTERESTING,
   we barfed if parse_parent() for a parent commit object failed.  We can
   ignore such a parent commit object.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano
2009-01-27 23:19:30 -08:00
parent 02322e1619
commit aeeae1b771
2 changed files with 44 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -183,8 +183,11 @@ static struct commit *handle_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct object *object
if (!tag->tagged)
die("bad tag");
object = parse_object(tag->tagged->sha1);
if (!object)
if (!object) {
if (flags & UNINTERESTING)
return NULL;
die("bad object %s", sha1_to_hex(tag->tagged->sha1));
}
}
/*
@ -479,9 +482,10 @@ static int add_parents_to_list(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit,
while (parent) {
struct commit *p = parent->item;
parent = parent->next;
if (p)
p->object.flags |= UNINTERESTING;
if (parse_commit(p) < 0)
return -1;
p->object.flags |= UNINTERESTING;
continue;
if (p->parents)
mark_parents_uninteresting(p);
if (p->object.flags & SEEN)