lock_file: make function-local locks non-static

Placing `struct lock_file`s on the stack used to be a bad idea, because
the temp- and lockfile-machinery would keep a pointer into the struct.
But after 076aa2cbd (tempfile: auto-allocate tempfiles on heap,
2017-09-05), we can safely have lockfiles on the stack. (This applies
even if a user returns early, leaving a locked lock behind.)

These `struct lock_file`s are local to their respective functions and we
can drop their staticness.

For good measure, I have inspected these sites and come to believe that
they always release the lock, with the possible exception of bailing out
using `die()` or `exit()` or by returning from a `cmd_foo()`.

As pointed out by Jeff King, it would be bad if someone held on to a
`struct lock_file *` for some reason. After some grepping, I agree with
his findings: no-one appears to be doing that.

Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Ågren
2018-05-09 22:55:38 +02:00
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 3c6fad4a3f
commit b227586831
10 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static void refuse_unconfigured_deny_delete_current(void)
static int command_singleton_iterator(void *cb_data, struct object_id *oid);
static int update_shallow_ref(struct command *cmd, struct shallow_info *si)
{
static struct lock_file shallow_lock;
struct lock_file shallow_lock = LOCK_INIT;
struct oid_array extra = OID_ARRAY_INIT;
struct check_connected_options opt = CHECK_CONNECTED_INIT;
uint32_t mask = 1 << (cmd->index % 32);