Merge branch 'en/dirty-merge-fixes'
The recursive merge strategy did not properly ensure there was no change between HEAD and the index before performing its operation, which has been corrected. * en/dirty-merge-fixes: merge: fix misleading pre-merge check documentation merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging t6044: add more testcases with staged changes before a merge is invoked merge-recursive: fix assumption that head tree being merged is HEAD merge-recursive: make sure when we say we abort that we actually abort t6044: add a testcase for index matching head, when head doesn't match HEAD t6044: verify that merges expected to abort actually abort index_has_changes(): avoid assuming operating on the_index read-cache.c: move index_has_changes() from merge.c
This commit is contained in:
@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ static void am_run(struct am_state *state, int resume)
|
||||
|
||||
refresh_and_write_cache();
|
||||
|
||||
if (index_has_changes(&sb)) {
|
||||
if (index_has_changes(&the_index, NULL, &sb)) {
|
||||
write_state_bool(state, "dirtyindex", 1);
|
||||
die(_("Dirty index: cannot apply patches (dirty: %s)"), sb.buf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1823,7 +1823,8 @@ static void am_run(struct am_state *state, int resume)
|
||||
* Applying the patch to an earlier tree and merging
|
||||
* the result may have produced the same tree as ours.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!apply_status && !index_has_changes(NULL)) {
|
||||
if (!apply_status &&
|
||||
!index_has_changes(&the_index, NULL, NULL)) {
|
||||
say(state, stdout, _("No changes -- Patch already applied."));
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1877,7 +1878,7 @@ static void am_resolve(struct am_state *state)
|
||||
|
||||
say(state, stdout, _("Applying: %.*s"), linelen(state->msg), state->msg);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!index_has_changes(NULL)) {
|
||||
if (!index_has_changes(&the_index, NULL, NULL)) {
|
||||
printf_ln(_("No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'?\n"
|
||||
"If there is nothing left to stage, chances are that something else\n"
|
||||
"already introduced the same changes; you might want to skip this patch."));
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user