CodingGuidelines: once it is in, it is not worth the code churn
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
|
|||||||
judgement call, the decision based more on real world
|
judgement call, the decision based more on real world
|
||||||
constraints people face than what the paper standard says.
|
constraints people face than what the paper standard says.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Fixing style violations while working on a real change as a
|
||||||
|
preparatory clean-up step is good, but otherwise avoid useless code
|
||||||
|
churn for the sake of conforming to the style.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
"Once it _is_ in the tree, it's not really worth the patch noise to
|
||||||
|
go and fix it up."
|
||||||
|
Cf. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/943020
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Make your code readable and sensible, and don't try to be clever.
|
Make your code readable and sensible, and don't try to be clever.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code
|
As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user