drop unused argc parameters
Many functions take an argv/argc pair, but never actually look at argc. This makes it useless at best (we use the NULL sentinel in argv to find the end of the array), and misleading at worst (what happens if the argc count does not match the argv NULL?). In each of these instances, the argv NULL does match the argc count, so there are no bugs here. But let's tighten the interfaces to make it harder to get wrong (and to reduce some -Wunused-parameter complaints). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
185e865226
commit
e885a84f1b
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ int run_add_interactive(const char *revision, const char *patch_mode,
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int interactive_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, int patch)
|
||||
int interactive_add(const char **argv, const char *prefix, int patch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pathspec pathspec;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ int cmd_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
|
||||
if (add_interactive) {
|
||||
if (pathspec_from_file)
|
||||
die(_("--pathspec-from-file is incompatible with --interactive/--patch"));
|
||||
exit(interactive_add(argc - 1, argv + 1, prefix, patch_interactive));
|
||||
exit(interactive_add(argv + 1, prefix, patch_interactive));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (legacy_stash_p) {
|
||||
struct pathspec pathspec;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user