revision parsing: make "rev -- paths" checks stronger.
If you don't have a "--" marker, then: - all of the arguments we are going to assume are pathspecs must exist in the working tree. - none of the arguments we parsed as revisions could be interpreted as a filename. so that there really isn't any possibility of confusion in case somebody does have a revision that looks like a pathname too. The former rule has been in effect; this implements the latter. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:
24
setup.c
24
setup.c
@ -80,11 +80,31 @@ void verify_filename(const char *prefix, const char *arg)
|
||||
if (!lstat(name, &st))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (errno == ENOENT)
|
||||
die("ambiguous argument '%s': unknown revision or filename\n"
|
||||
"Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions", arg);
|
||||
die("ambiguous argument '%s': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.\n"
|
||||
"Use '--' to separate paths from revisions", arg);
|
||||
die("'%s': %s", arg, strerror(errno));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Opposite of the above: the command line did not have -- marker
|
||||
* and we parsed the arg as a refname. It should not be interpretable
|
||||
* as a filename.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void verify_non_filename(const char *prefix, const char *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *name;
|
||||
struct stat st;
|
||||
|
||||
if (*arg == '-')
|
||||
return; /* flag */
|
||||
name = prefix ? prefix_filename(prefix, strlen(prefix), arg) : arg;
|
||||
if (!lstat(name, &st))
|
||||
die("ambiguous argument '%s': both revision and filename\n"
|
||||
"Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions", arg);
|
||||
if (errno != ENOENT)
|
||||
die("'%s': %s", arg, strerror(errno));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const char **get_pathspec(const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *entry = *pathspec;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user