merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case
When o->call_depth>0 and we have conflicts, we try to find "middle ground" when creating the virtual merge base. In the case of content conflicts, this can be done by doing a three-way content merge and using the result. In all parts where the three-way content merge is clean, it is the correct middle ground, and in parts where it conflicts there is no middle ground but the conflict markers provide a good compromise since they are unlikely to accidentally match any further changes. In the case of a modify/delete conflict, we cannot do the same thing. Accepting either endpoint as the resolution for the virtual merge base runs the risk that when handling the non-recursive case we will silently accept one person's resolution over another without flagging a conflict. In this case, the closest "middle ground" we have is actually the merge base of the candidate merge bases. (We could alternatively attempt a three way content merge using an empty file in place of the deleted file, but that seems to be more work than necessary.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
5b448b8530
commit
ec61d14963
@ -1322,27 +1322,42 @@ error_return:
|
||||
|
||||
static void handle_delete_modify(struct merge_options *o,
|
||||
const char *path,
|
||||
const char *new_path,
|
||||
unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
|
||||
unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
|
||||
unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!a_sha) {
|
||||
char *renamed = NULL;
|
||||
if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
|
||||
renamed = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (o->call_depth) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We cannot arbitrarily accept either a_sha or b_sha as
|
||||
* correct; since there is no true "middle point" between
|
||||
* them, simply reuse the base version for virtual merge base.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
remove_file_from_cache(path);
|
||||
update_file(o, 0, o_sha, o_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
|
||||
} else if (!a_sha) {
|
||||
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
|
||||
"and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
|
||||
path, o->branch1,
|
||||
o->branch2, o->branch2, path,
|
||||
NULL == new_path ? "" : " at ",
|
||||
NULL == new_path ? "" : new_path);
|
||||
update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, new_path ? new_path : path);
|
||||
NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
|
||||
NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
|
||||
update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
|
||||
"and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
|
||||
path, o->branch2,
|
||||
o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
|
||||
NULL == new_path ? "" : " at ",
|
||||
NULL == new_path ? "" : new_path);
|
||||
update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, new_path ? new_path : path);
|
||||
NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
|
||||
NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
|
||||
update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
free(renamed);
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
|
||||
@ -1512,14 +1527,9 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
|
||||
remove_file(o, 1, path, !a_sha);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Modify/delete; deleted side may have put a directory in the way */
|
||||
char *renamed = NULL;
|
||||
clean_merge = 0;
|
||||
if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
|
||||
renamed = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
handle_delete_modify(o, path, renamed,
|
||||
handle_delete_modify(o, path, o_sha, o_mode,
|
||||
a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode);
|
||||
free(renamed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if ((!o_sha && a_sha && !b_sha) ||
|
||||
(!o_sha && !a_sha && b_sha)) {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user