fetch: improve the error messages emitted for conflicting refspecs
If we find two refspecs that want to update the same local reference, emit an error message that is more informative based on whether one of the conflicting refspecs is an opportunistic update during a fetch with explicit command-line refspecs. And especially, do not die if an opportunistic reference update conflicts with an express wish of the user; rather, just emit a warning and skip the opportunistic reference update. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
76ea6717fe
commit
f096e6e826
25
remote.c
25
remote.c
@ -747,9 +747,28 @@ int for_each_remote(each_remote_fn fn, void *priv)
|
||||
|
||||
static void handle_duplicate(struct ref *ref1, struct ref *ref2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (strcmp(ref1->name, ref2->name))
|
||||
die(_("%s tracks both %s and %s"),
|
||||
ref2->peer_ref->name, ref1->name, ref2->name);
|
||||
if (strcmp(ref1->name, ref2->name)) {
|
||||
if (ref1->fetch_head_status != FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE &&
|
||||
ref2->fetch_head_status != FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE) {
|
||||
die(_("Cannot fetch both %s and %s to %s"),
|
||||
ref1->name, ref2->name, ref2->peer_ref->name);
|
||||
} else if (ref1->fetch_head_status != FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE &&
|
||||
ref2->fetch_head_status == FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE) {
|
||||
warning(_("%s usually tracks %s, not %s"),
|
||||
ref2->peer_ref->name, ref2->name, ref1->name);
|
||||
} else if (ref1->fetch_head_status == FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE &&
|
||||
ref2->fetch_head_status == FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE) {
|
||||
die(_("%s tracks both %s and %s"),
|
||||
ref2->peer_ref->name, ref1->name, ref2->name);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This last possibility doesn't occur because
|
||||
* FETCH_HEAD_IGNORE entries always appear at
|
||||
* the end of the list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
die(_("Internal error"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
free(ref2->peer_ref);
|
||||
free(ref2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user