merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames
If a file on one side of history was renamed, and merely modified on the other side, then applying a directory rename to the modified side gives us a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We should only apply directory renames to pairs representing either adds or renames. Making this change means that a directory rename testcase that was previously reported as a rename/delete conflict will now be reported as a modify/delete conflict. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Junio C Hamano

parent
8f581e3a47
commit
febb3a8609
@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ static void compute_collisions(struct hashmap *collisions,
|
||||
char *new_path;
|
||||
struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (pair->status == 'D')
|
||||
if (pair->status != 'A' && pair->status != 'R')
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
dir_rename_ent = check_dir_renamed(pair->two->path,
|
||||
dir_renames);
|
||||
@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ static struct string_list *get_renames(struct merge_options *o,
|
||||
struct diff_filepair *pair = pairs->queue[i];
|
||||
char *new_path; /* non-NULL only with directory renames */
|
||||
|
||||
if (pair->status == 'D') {
|
||||
if (pair->status != 'A' && pair->status != 'R') {
|
||||
diff_free_filepair(pair);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user