* maint-2.44:
Git 2.44.3
Git 2.43.6
Git 2.42.4
Git 2.41.3
Git 2.40.4
credential: disallow Carriage Returns in the protocol by default
credential: sanitize the user prompt
credential_format(): also encode <host>[:<port>]
t7300: work around platform-specific behaviour with long paths on MinGW
compat/regex: fix argument order to calloc(3)
mingw: drop bogus (and unneeded) declaration of `_pgmptr`
ci: remove 'Upload failed tests' directories' step from linux32 jobs
* maint-2.43:
Git 2.43.6
Git 2.42.4
Git 2.41.3
Git 2.40.4
credential: disallow Carriage Returns in the protocol by default
credential: sanitize the user prompt
credential_format(): also encode <host>[:<port>]
t7300: work around platform-specific behaviour with long paths on MinGW
compat/regex: fix argument order to calloc(3)
mingw: drop bogus (and unneeded) declaration of `_pgmptr`
ci: remove 'Upload failed tests' directories' step from linux32 jobs
* maint-2.42:
Git 2.42.4
Git 2.41.3
Git 2.40.4
credential: disallow Carriage Returns in the protocol by default
credential: sanitize the user prompt
credential_format(): also encode <host>[:<port>]
t7300: work around platform-specific behaviour with long paths on MinGW
compat/regex: fix argument order to calloc(3)
mingw: drop bogus (and unneeded) declaration of `_pgmptr`
ci: remove 'Upload failed tests' directories' step from linux32 jobs
* maint-2.41:
Git 2.41.3
Git 2.40.4
credential: disallow Carriage Returns in the protocol by default
credential: sanitize the user prompt
credential_format(): also encode <host>[:<port>]
t7300: work around platform-specific behaviour with long paths on MinGW
compat/regex: fix argument order to calloc(3)
mingw: drop bogus (and unneeded) declaration of `_pgmptr`
ci: remove 'Upload failed tests' directories' step from linux32 jobs
* maint-2.40:
Git 2.40.4
credential: disallow Carriage Returns in the protocol by default
credential: sanitize the user prompt
credential_format(): also encode <host>[:<port>]
t7300: work around platform-specific behaviour with long paths on MinGW
compat/regex: fix argument order to calloc(3)
mingw: drop bogus (and unneeded) declaration of `_pgmptr`
ci: remove 'Upload failed tests' directories' step from linux32 jobs
While Git has documented that the credential protocol is line-based,
with newlines as terminators, the exact shape of a newline has not been
documented.
From Git's perspective, which is firmly rooted in the Linux ecosystem,
it is clear that "a newline" means a Line Feed character.
However, even Git's credential protocol respects Windows line endings
(a Carriage Return character followed by a Line Feed character, "CR/LF")
by virtue of using `strbuf_getline()`.
There is a third category of line endings that has been used originally
by MacOS, and that is respected by the default line readers of .NET and
node.js: bare Carriage Returns.
Git cannot handle those, and what is worse: Git's remedy against
CVE-2020-5260 does not catch when credential helpers are used that
interpret bare Carriage Returns as newlines.
Git Credential Manager addressed this as CVE-2024-50338, but other
credential helpers may still be vulnerable. So let's not only disallow
Line Feed characters as part of the values in the credential protocol,
but also disallow Carriage Return characters.
In the unlikely event that a credential helper relies on Carriage
Returns in the protocol, introduce an escape hatch via the
`credential.protectProtocol` config setting.
This addresses CVE-2024-52006.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When asking the user interactively for credentials, we want to avoid
misleading them e.g. via control sequences that pretend that the URL
targets a trusted host when it does not.
While Git learned, over the course of the preceding commits, to disallow
URLs containing URL-encoded control characters by default, credential
helpers are still allowed to specify values very freely (apart from Line
Feed and NUL characters, anything is allowed), and this would allow,
say, a username containing control characters to be specified that would
then be displayed in the interactive terminal prompt asking the user for
the password, potentially sending those control characters directly to
the terminal. This is undesirable because control characters can be used
to mislead users to divulge secret information to untrusted sites.
To prevent such an attack vector, let's add a `git_prompt()` that forces
the displayed text to be sanitized, i.e. displaying question marks
instead of control characters.
Note: While this commit's diff changes a lot of `user@host` strings to
`user%40host`, which may look suspicious on the surface, there is a good
reason for that: this string specifies a user name, not a
<username>@<hostname> combination! In the context of t5541, the actual
combination looks like this: `user%40@127.0.0.1:5541`. Therefore, these
string replacements document a net improvement introduced by this
commit, as `user@host@127.0.0.1` could have left readers wondering where
the user name ends and where the host name begins.
Hinted-at-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Even though `git help cli` recommends users to prefer using
"--option=value" over "--option value", there can be reasons why
giving them separately is a good idea. One reason is that shells do
not perform tilde expansion for `--option=~/path/name` but they
expand `--options ~/path/name` just fine.
This is not a problem for many options whose option parsing is
properly written using OPT_FILENAME(), because the value given to
OPT_FILENAME() is tilde-expanded internally by us, but some commands
take a pathname as a mere string, which needs this trick to have the
shell help us.
I think the reason we originally decided to recommend the stuck form
was because an option that takes an optional value requires you to
use it in the stuck form, and it is one less thing for users to
worry about if they get into the habit to always use the stuck form.
But we should be discouraging ourselves from adding an option with
an optional value in the first place, and we might want to weaken
the current recommendation.
In any case, let's describe this one case where it is necessary to
use the separate form, with an example.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Doc update to clarify how periodical maintenance are scheduled,
spread across time to avoid thundering hurds.
* sk/doc-maintenance-schedule:
doc: add a note about staggering of maintenance
Besides the textual symref, we also allow symbolic links as the symref.
So, we should also provide the consistency check as what we have done
for textual symref. And also we consider deprecating writing the
symbolic links. We first need to access whether symbolic links still
be used. So, add a new fsck message "symlinkRef(INFO)" to tell the
user be aware of this information.
We have already introduced "files_fsck_symref_target". We should reuse
this function to handle the symrefs which use legacy symbolic links. We
should not check the trailing garbage for symbolic refs. Add a new
parameter "symbolic_link" to disable some checks which should only be
executed for textual symrefs.
And we need to also generate the "referent" parameter for reusing
"files_fsck_symref_target" by the following steps:
1. Use "strbuf_add_real_path" to resolve the symlink and get the
absolute path "ref_content" which the symlink ref points to.
2. Generate the absolute path "abs_gitdir" of "gitdir" and combine
"ref_content" and "abs_gitdir" to extract the relative path
"relative_referent_path".
3. If "ref_content" is outside of "gitdir", we just set "referent" with
"ref_content". Instead, we set "referent" with
"relative_referent_path".
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ideally, we want to the users use "git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs
instead of writing raw contents into the filesystem. However, "git
symbolic-ref" is strict with the refname but not strict with the
referent. For example, we can make the "referent" located at the
"$(gitdir)/logs/aaa" and manually write the content into this where we
can still successfully parse this symref by using "git rev-parse".
$ git init repo && cd repo && git commit --allow-empty -mx
$ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/test logs/aaa
$ echo $(git rev-parse HEAD) > .git/logs/aaa
$ git rev-parse test
We may need to add some restrictions for "referent" parameter when using
"git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs because ideally all the
nonpseudo-refs should be located under the "refs" directory and we may
tighten this in the future.
In order to tell the user we may tighten the above situation, create
a new fsck message "symrefTargetIsNotARef" to notify the user that this
may become an error in the future.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have code that checks regular ref contents, but we do not yet check
the contents of symbolic refs. By using "parse_loose_ref_content" for
symbolic refs, we will get the information of the "referent".
We do not need to check the "referent" by opening the file. This is
because if "referent" exists in the file system, we will eventually
check its correctness by inspecting every file in the "refs" directory.
If the "referent" does not exist in the filesystem, this is OK as it is
seen as the dangling symref.
So we just need to check the "referent" string content. A regular ref
could be accepted as a textual symref if it begins with "ref:", followed
by zero or more whitespaces, followed by the full refname, followed only
by whitespace characters. However, we always write a single SP after
"ref:" and a single LF after the refname. It may seem that we should
report a fsck error message when the "referent" does not apply above
rules and we should not be so aggressive because third-party
reimplementations of Git may have taken advantage of the looser syntax.
Put it more specific, we accept the following contents:
1. "ref: refs/heads/master "
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n \n"
3. "ref: refs/heads/master\n\n"
When introducing the regular ref content checks, we created two fsck
infos "refMissingNewline" and "trailingRefContent" which exactly
represents above situations. So we will reuse these two fsck messages to
write checks to info the user about these situations.
But we do not allow any other trailing garbage. The followings are bad
symref contents which will be reported as fsck error by "git-fsck(1)".
1. "ref: refs/heads/master garbage\n"
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n\n\n garbage "
And we introduce a new "badReferentName(ERROR)" fsck message to report
above errors by using "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" to check
the "referent". Since both "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format"
don't work with whitespaces, we use the trimmed version of "referent"
with these functions.
In order to add checks, we will do the following things:
1. Record the untrimmed length "orig_len" and untrimmed last byte
"orig_last_byte".
2. Use "strbuf_rtrim" to trim the whitespaces or newlines to make sure
"is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" won't be failed by them.
3. Use "orig_len" and "orig_last_byte" to check whether the "referent"
misses '\n' at the end or it has trailing whitespaces or newlines.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have already used "parse_loose_ref_contents" function to check
whether the ref content is valid in files backend. However, by
using "parse_loose_ref_contents", we allow the ref's content to end with
garbage or without a newline.
Even though we never create such loose refs ourselves, we have accepted
such loose refs. So, it is entirely possible that some third-party tools
may rely on such loose refs being valid. We should not report an error
fsck message at current. We should notify the users about such
"curiously formatted" loose refs so that adequate care is taken before
we decide to tighten the rules in the future.
And it's not suitable either to report a warn fsck message to the user.
We don't yet want the "--strict" flag that controls this bit to end up
generating errors for such weirdly-formatted reference contents, as we
first want to assess whether this retroactive tightening will cause
issues for any tools out there. It may cause compatibility issues which
may break the repository. So, we add the following two fsck infos to
represent the situation where the ref content ends without newline or
has trailing garbages:
1. refMissingNewline(INFO): A loose ref that does not end with
newline(LF).
2. trailingRefContent(INFO): A loose ref has trailing content.
It might appear that we can't provide the user with any warnings by
using FSCK_INFO. However, in "fsck.c::fsck_vreport", we will convert
FSCK_INFO to FSCK_WARN and we can still warn the user about these
situations when using "git refs verify" without introducing
compatibility issues.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git-fsck(1)" implicitly checks the ref content by passing the
callback "fsck_handle_ref" to the "refs.c::refs_for_each_rawref".
Then, it will check whether the ref content (eventually "oid")
is valid. If not, it will report the following error to the user.
error: refs/heads/main: invalid sha1 pointer 0000...
And it will also report above errors when there are dangling symrefs
in the repository wrongly. This does not align with the behavior of
the "git symbolic-ref" command which allows users to create dangling
symrefs.
As we have already introduced the "git refs verify" command, we'd better
check the ref content explicitly in the "git refs verify" command thus
later we could remove these checks in "git-fsck(1)" and launch a
subprocess to call "git refs verify" in "git-fsck(1)" to make the
"git-fsck(1)" more clean.
Following what "git-fsck(1)" does, add a similar check to "git refs
verify". Then add a new fsck error message "badRefContent(ERROR)" to
represent that a ref has an invalid content.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git gc" discards any objects that are outside promisor packs that
are referred to by an object in a promisor pack, and we do not
refetch them from the promisor at runtime, resulting an unusable
repository. Work it around by including these objects in the
referring promisor pack at the receiving end of the fetch.
* jt/repack-local-promisor:
index-pack: repack local links into promisor packs
t5300: move --window clamp test next to unclamped
t0410: use from-scratch server
t0410: make test description clearer
Currently,
- Running "index-pack --promisor" outside a repo segfaults.
- It may be confusing to a user that running "index-pack --promisor"
within a repo may make changes to the repo's object DB, especially
since the packs indexed by the index-pack invocation may not even be
related to the repo.
As discussed in [1] and [2], teaching --promisor to forbid a packfile
name solves both these problems. This combination of arguments requires
a repo (since we are writing the resulting .pack and .idx to it) and it
is clear that the files are related to the repo.
Currently, Git uses "index-pack --promisor" only when fetching into
a repo, so it could be argued that we should teach "index-pack" a
new argument (say, "--fetching-mode") instead of tying --promisor to
a generic argument like the packfile name. However, this --promisor
feature could conceivably be used whenever we have a packfile that is
known to come from the promisor remote (whether obtained through Git's
fetch protocol or through other means) so not using a new argument seems
reasonable - one could envision a user-made script obtaining a packfile
and then running "index-pack --promisor --stdin", for example. In fact,
it might be possible to relax the restriction further (say, by also
allowing --promisor when indexing a packfile that is in the object DB),
but relaxing the restriction is backwards-compatible so we can revisit
that later.
One thing to watch out for is the possibility of a future Git feature
that indexes a pack in the context of a repo, but does not necessarily
write the resulting pack to it (and does not necessarily desire to
make any changes to the object DB). One such feature would be fetch
quarantine, which might need the repo context in order to detect
hash collisions, but would also need to ensure that the object DB
is undisturbed in case the fetch fails for whatever reason, even if
the reason occurs only after the indexing is complete. It may not be
obvious to the implementer of such a feature that "index-pack" could
sometimes write packs other than the indexed pack to the object DB,
but there are already other ways that "fetch" could write to the object
DB (in particular, packfile URIs and bundle URIs), so hopefully the
implementation of this future feature would already include a test that
the object DB be undisturbed.
This change requires the change to t5300 by 1f52cdfacb (index-pack:
document and test the --promisor option, 2022-03-09) to be undone.
(--promisor is already tested indirectly, so we don't need the explicit
test here any more.)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20241114005652.GC1140565@coredump.intra.peff.net/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20241119185345.GB15723@coredump.intra.peff.net/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By the way, we also change the sentences where git-diff would refer to
itself, so that no link is created in the HTML output.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The format change is only applied to the sections of the file that are
filtered in git-diff.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation for git-diff has been updated to follow the new
documentation guidelines. The following changes have been applied to
the series of patches:
- switching the synopsis to a synopsis block which will automatically
format placeholders in italics and keywords in monospace
- use _<placeholder>_ instead of <placeholder> in the description
- use `backticks for keywords and more complex option
descriptions`. The new rendering engine will apply synopsis rules to
these spans.
- prevent git-diff from self-referencing itself via gitlink macro when
the generated link would point to the same page.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It might be naïve to think that those who need this education would end
up here in the first place. But I think it’s good to mention this
high-level concept here on a command which provides a backup strategy.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mention `--all` as an alternative in “Specifying References”.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don’t need this part now that we have a fleshed-out `--all` example.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Provide an example about how to make a “full backup” with caveats about
what that means in this case.
This is a requested use-case.[1] But the doc is a bit unassuming
about it:
If you want to match `git clone --mirror`, which would include your
refs such as `refs/remotes/*`, use `--all`.
The user cannot be expected to formulate “I want a full backup” as “I
want to match `git clone --mirror`” for a bundle file or something.
Let’s drop this mention of `--all` later in the doc and frontload it.
† 1: E.g.:
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5578270/fully-backup-a-git-repo
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11792671/how-to-git-bundle-a-complete-repo
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There somehow ended up too many bogus "merge X later to maint"
comments for topics that cannot be merged ever down to 'maint'
because they were forked from more recent integration branches
in the draft release notes. Remove them, as they are inviting
for mistakes later.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Historically, Git has allowed users to clone from an untrusted
repository, and we have documented that this is safe to do so:
`upload-pack` tries to avoid any dangerous configuration options or
hooks from the repository it's serving, making it safe to clone an
untrusted directory and run commands on the resulting clone.
However, this was broken by f4aa8c8bb1 ("fetch/clone: detect dubious
ownership of local repositories", 2024-04-10) in an attempt to make
things more secure. That change resulted in a variety of problems when
cloning locally and over SSH, but it did not change the stated security
boundary. Because the security boundary has not changed, it is safe to
adjust part of the code that patch introduced.
To do that and restore the previous functionality, adjust enter_repo to
take two flags instead of one.
The two bits are
- ENTER_REPO_STRICT: callers that require exact paths (as opposed
to allowing known suffixes like ".git", ".git/.git" to be
omitted) can set this bit. Corresponds to the "strict" parameter
that the flags word replaces.
- ENTER_REPO_ANY_OWNER_OK: callers that are willing to run without
ownership check can set this bit.
The former is --strict-paths option of "git daemon". The latter is
set only by upload-pack, which honors the claimed security boundary.
Note that local clones across ownership boundaries require --no-local so
that upload-pack is used. Document this fact in the manual page and
provide an example.
This patch was based on one written by Junio C Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--shallow-exclude=<ref>" option to various history transfer
commands takes a ref, not an arbitrary revision.
* en/shallow-exclude-takes-a-ref-fix:
doc: correct misleading descriptions for --shallow-exclude
upload-pack: fix ambiguous error message
Teach index-pack to, when processing the objects in a pack with
--promisor specified on the CLI, repack local objects (and the local
objects that they refer to, recursively) referenced by these objects
into promisor packs.
This prevents the situation in which, when fetching from a promisor
remote, we end up with promisor objects (newly fetched) referring
to non-promisor objects (locally created prior to the fetch). This
situation may arise if the client had previously pushed objects to the
remote, for example. One issue that arises in this situation is that,
if the non-promisor objects become inaccessible except through promisor
objects (for example, if the branch pointing to them has moved to
point to the promisor object that refers to them), then GC will garbage
collect them. There are other ways to solve this, but the simplest
seems to be to enforce the invariant that we don't have promisor objects
referring to non-promisor objects.
This repacking is done from index-pack to minimize the performance
impact. During a fetch, the only time most objects are fully inflated
in memory is when their object ID is computed, so we also scan the
objects (to see which objects they refer to) during this time.
Also to minimize the performance impact, an object is calculated to be
local if it's a loose object or present in a non-promisor pack. (If it's
also in a promisor pack or referred to by an object in a promisor pack,
it is technically already a promisor object. But a misidentification
of a promisor object as a non-promisor object is relatively benign
here - we will thus repack that promisor object into a promisor pack,
duplicating it in the object store, but there is no correctness issue,
just an issue of inefficiency.)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
