When the input rev_info has UNINTERESTING starting points, we want to be
sure that the UNINTERESTING flag is passed appropriately through the
objects. To match how this is done in places such as 'git pack-objects', we
use the mark_edges_uninteresting() method.
This method has an option for using the "sparse" walk, which is similar in
spirit to the path-walk API's walk. To be sure to keep it independent, add a
new 'prune_all_uninteresting' option to the path_walk_info struct.
To check how the UNINTERSTING flag is spread through our objects, extend the
'test-tool path-walk' command to output whether or not an object has that
flag. This changes our tests significantly, including the removal of some
objects that were previously visited due to the incomplete implementation.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The rev_info that is specified for a path-walk traversal may specify
visiting tag refs (both lightweight and annotated) and also may specify
indexed objects (blobs and trees). Update the path-walk API to walk
these objects as well.
When walking tags, we need to peel the annotated objects until reaching
a non-tag object. If we reach a commit, then we can add it to the
pending objects to make sure we visit in the commit walk portion. If we
reach a tree, then we will assume that it is a root tree. If we reach a
blob, then we have no good path name and so add it to a new list of
"tagged blobs".
When the rev_info includes the "--indexed-objects" flag, then the
pending set includes blobs and trees found in the cache entries and
cache-tree. The cache entries are usually blobs, though they could be
trees in the case of a sparse index. The cache-tree stores
previously-hashed tree objects but these are cleared out when staging
objects below those paths. We add tests that demonstrate this.
The indexed objects come with a non-NULL 'path' value in the pending
item. This allows us to prepopulate the 'path_to_lists' strmap with
lists for these paths.
The tricky thing about this walk is that we will want to combine the
indexed objects walk with the commit walk, especially in the future case
of walking objects during a command like 'git repack'.
Whenever possible, we want the objects from the index to be grouped with
similar objects in history. We don't want to miss any paths that appear
only in the index and not in the commit history.
Thus, we need to be careful to let the path stack be populated initially
with only the root tree path (and possibly tags and tagged blobs) and go
through the normal depth-first search. Afterwards, if there are other
paths that are remaining in the paths_to_lists strmap, we should then
iterate through the stack and visit those objects recursively.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We add the ability to filter the object types in the path-walk API so
the callback function is called fewer times.
This adds the ability to ask for the commits in a list, as well. We
re-use the empty string for this set of objects because these are passed
directly to the callback function instead of being part of the
'path_stack'.
Future changes will add the ability to visit annotated tags.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add some tests based on the current behavior, doing interesting checks
for different sets of branches, ranges, and the --boundary option. This
sets a baseline for the behavior and we can extend it as new options are
introduced.
Store and output a 'batch_nr' value so we can demonstrate that the paths are
grouped together in a batch and not following some other ordering. This
allows us to test the depth-first behavior of the path-walk API. However, we
purposefully do not test the order of the objects in the batch, so the
output is compared to the expected output through a sort.
It is important to mention that the behavior of the API will change soon as
we start to handle UNINTERESTING objects differently, but these tests will
demonstrate the change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
