"git fsck" learned to issue warnings on "curiously formatted" ref
contents that have always been taken valid but something Git
wouldn't have written itself (e.g., missing terminating end-of-line
after the full object name).
* sj/ref-contents-check:
ref: add symlink ref content check for files backend
ref: check whether the target of the symref is a ref
ref: add basic symref content check for files backend
ref: add more strict checks for regular refs
ref: port git-fsck(1) regular refs check for files backend
ref: support multiple worktrees check for refs
ref: initialize ref name outside of check functions
ref: check the full refname instead of basename
ref: initialize "fsck_ref_report" with zero
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Besides the textual symref, we also allow symbolic links as the symref.
So, we should also provide the consistency check as what we have done
for textual symref. And also we consider deprecating writing the
symbolic links. We first need to access whether symbolic links still
be used. So, add a new fsck message "symlinkRef(INFO)" to tell the
user be aware of this information.
We have already introduced "files_fsck_symref_target". We should reuse
this function to handle the symrefs which use legacy symbolic links. We
should not check the trailing garbage for symbolic refs. Add a new
parameter "symbolic_link" to disable some checks which should only be
executed for textual symrefs.
And we need to also generate the "referent" parameter for reusing
"files_fsck_symref_target" by the following steps:
1. Use "strbuf_add_real_path" to resolve the symlink and get the
absolute path "ref_content" which the symlink ref points to.
2. Generate the absolute path "abs_gitdir" of "gitdir" and combine
"ref_content" and "abs_gitdir" to extract the relative path
"relative_referent_path".
3. If "ref_content" is outside of "gitdir", we just set "referent" with
"ref_content". Instead, we set "referent" with
"relative_referent_path".
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ideally, we want to the users use "git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs
instead of writing raw contents into the filesystem. However, "git
symbolic-ref" is strict with the refname but not strict with the
referent. For example, we can make the "referent" located at the
"$(gitdir)/logs/aaa" and manually write the content into this where we
can still successfully parse this symref by using "git rev-parse".
$ git init repo && cd repo && git commit --allow-empty -mx
$ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/test logs/aaa
$ echo $(git rev-parse HEAD) > .git/logs/aaa
$ git rev-parse test
We may need to add some restrictions for "referent" parameter when using
"git symbolic-ref" to create symrefs because ideally all the
nonpseudo-refs should be located under the "refs" directory and we may
tighten this in the future.
In order to tell the user we may tighten the above situation, create
a new fsck message "symrefTargetIsNotARef" to notify the user that this
may become an error in the future.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have code that checks regular ref contents, but we do not yet check
the contents of symbolic refs. By using "parse_loose_ref_content" for
symbolic refs, we will get the information of the "referent".
We do not need to check the "referent" by opening the file. This is
because if "referent" exists in the file system, we will eventually
check its correctness by inspecting every file in the "refs" directory.
If the "referent" does not exist in the filesystem, this is OK as it is
seen as the dangling symref.
So we just need to check the "referent" string content. A regular ref
could be accepted as a textual symref if it begins with "ref:", followed
by zero or more whitespaces, followed by the full refname, followed only
by whitespace characters. However, we always write a single SP after
"ref:" and a single LF after the refname. It may seem that we should
report a fsck error message when the "referent" does not apply above
rules and we should not be so aggressive because third-party
reimplementations of Git may have taken advantage of the looser syntax.
Put it more specific, we accept the following contents:
1. "ref: refs/heads/master "
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n \n"
3. "ref: refs/heads/master\n\n"
When introducing the regular ref content checks, we created two fsck
infos "refMissingNewline" and "trailingRefContent" which exactly
represents above situations. So we will reuse these two fsck messages to
write checks to info the user about these situations.
But we do not allow any other trailing garbage. The followings are bad
symref contents which will be reported as fsck error by "git-fsck(1)".
1. "ref: refs/heads/master garbage\n"
2. "ref: refs/heads/master \n\n\n garbage "
And we introduce a new "badReferentName(ERROR)" fsck message to report
above errors by using "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" to check
the "referent". Since both "is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format"
don't work with whitespaces, we use the trimmed version of "referent"
with these functions.
In order to add checks, we will do the following things:
1. Record the untrimmed length "orig_len" and untrimmed last byte
"orig_last_byte".
2. Use "strbuf_rtrim" to trim the whitespaces or newlines to make sure
"is_root_ref" and "check_refname_format" won't be failed by them.
3. Use "orig_len" and "orig_last_byte" to check whether the "referent"
misses '\n' at the end or it has trailing whitespaces or newlines.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have already used "parse_loose_ref_contents" function to check
whether the ref content is valid in files backend. However, by
using "parse_loose_ref_contents", we allow the ref's content to end with
garbage or without a newline.
Even though we never create such loose refs ourselves, we have accepted
such loose refs. So, it is entirely possible that some third-party tools
may rely on such loose refs being valid. We should not report an error
fsck message at current. We should notify the users about such
"curiously formatted" loose refs so that adequate care is taken before
we decide to tighten the rules in the future.
And it's not suitable either to report a warn fsck message to the user.
We don't yet want the "--strict" flag that controls this bit to end up
generating errors for such weirdly-formatted reference contents, as we
first want to assess whether this retroactive tightening will cause
issues for any tools out there. It may cause compatibility issues which
may break the repository. So, we add the following two fsck infos to
represent the situation where the ref content ends without newline or
has trailing garbages:
1. refMissingNewline(INFO): A loose ref that does not end with
newline(LF).
2. trailingRefContent(INFO): A loose ref has trailing content.
It might appear that we can't provide the user with any warnings by
using FSCK_INFO. However, in "fsck.c::fsck_vreport", we will convert
FSCK_INFO to FSCK_WARN and we can still warn the user about these
situations when using "git refs verify" without introducing
compatibility issues.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git-fsck(1)" implicitly checks the ref content by passing the
callback "fsck_handle_ref" to the "refs.c::refs_for_each_rawref".
Then, it will check whether the ref content (eventually "oid")
is valid. If not, it will report the following error to the user.
error: refs/heads/main: invalid sha1 pointer 0000...
And it will also report above errors when there are dangling symrefs
in the repository wrongly. This does not align with the behavior of
the "git symbolic-ref" command which allows users to create dangling
symrefs.
As we have already introduced the "git refs verify" command, we'd better
check the ref content explicitly in the "git refs verify" command thus
later we could remove these checks in "git-fsck(1)" and launch a
subprocess to call "git refs verify" in "git-fsck(1)" to make the
"git-fsck(1)" more clean.
Following what "git-fsck(1)" does, add a similar check to "git refs
verify". Then add a new fsck error message "badRefContent(ERROR)" to
represent that a ref has an invalid content.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have already set up the infrastructure to check the consistency for
refs, but we do not support multiple worktrees. However, "git-fsck(1)"
will check the refs of worktrees. As we decide to get feature parity
with "git-fsck(1)", we need to set up support for multiple worktrees.
Because each worktree has its own specific refs, instead of just showing
the users "refs/worktree/foo", we need to display the full name such as
"worktrees/<id>/refs/worktree/foo". So we should know the id of the
worktree to get the full name. Add a new parameter "struct worktree *"
for "refs-internal.h::fsck_fn". Then change the related functions to
follow this new interface.
The "packed-refs" only exists in the main worktree, so we should only
check "packed-refs" in the main worktree. Use "is_main_worktree" method
to skip checking "packed-refs" in "packed_fsck" function.
Then, enhance the "files-backend.c::files_fsck_refs_dir" function to add
"worktree/<id>/" prefix when we are not in the main worktree.
Last, add a new test to check the refname when there are multiple
worktrees to exercise the code.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In "files-backend.c::files_fsck_refs_name", we validate the refname
format by using "check_refname_format" to check the basename of the
iterator with "REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL" flag.
However, this is a bad implementation. Although we doesn't allow a
single "@" in ".git" directory, we do allow "refs/heads/@". So, we will
report an error wrongly when there is a "refs/heads/@" ref by using one
level refname "@".
Because we just check one level refname, we either cannot check the
other parts of the full refname. And we will ignore the following
errors:
"refs/heads/ new-feature/test"
"refs/heads/~new-feature/test"
In order to fix the above problem, enhance "files_fsck_refs_name" to use
the full name for "check_refname_format". Then, replace the tests which
are related to "@" and add tests to exercise the above situations using
for loop to avoid repetition.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-fsck(1) only implicitly checks the reference, it does not fully
check refs with bad format name such as standalone "@".
However, a file ending with ".lock" should not be marked as having a bad
ref name. It is expected that concurrent writers may have such lock files.
We currently ignore this situation. But for bare ".lock" file, we will
report it as error.
In order to provide such checks, add a new fsck message id "badRefName"
with default ERROR type. Use existing "check_refname_format" to explicit
check the ref name. And add a new unit test to verify the functionality.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
