Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch fixes a racy test failure in t4129.
The deletion test added by e95d515141 (apply: canonicalize modes read
from patches, 2024-08-05) wants to make sure that git-apply does not
complain about a non-canonical mode in the patch, even if that mode does
not match the working tree file. So it does this:
echo content >non-canon &&
git add non-canon &&
chmod 666 non-canon &&
This is wrong, because running chmod will update the ctime on the file,
making it stat-dirty and causing git-apply to refuse to apply the patch.
But this only happens sometimes, since it depends on the timestamps
crossing a second boundary (but it triggers pretty quickly when run with
--stress).
We can fix this by doing the chmod before updating the index. The order
isn't important here, as the mode will be canonicalized to 100644 in the
index anyway (in fact, the chmod is not even that important in the first
place, since git-apply will only look at the index; I only added it as
an extra confirmation that git-apply would not be confused by it).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git stores only canonical modes for blobs. So for a regular file, we
care about only "100644" or "100755" (depending only on the executable
bit), but never modes where the group or other permissions are more
exotic. So never "100664", "100700", etc. When a file in the working
tree has such a mode, we quietly turn it into one of the two canonical
modes, and that's what is stored both in the index and in tree objects.
However, we don't canonicalize modes we read from incoming patches in
git-apply. These may appear in a few lines:
- "old mode" / "new mode" lines for mode changes
- "new file mode" lines for newly created files
- "deleted file mode" for removing files
For "new mode" and for "new file mode", this is harmless. The patch is
asking the result to have a certain mode, but:
- when we add an index entry (for --index or --cached), it is
canonicalized as we create the entry, via create_ce_mode().
- for a working tree file, try_create_file() passes either 0777 or
0666 to open(), so what you get depends only on your umask, not any
other bits (aside from the executable bit) in the original mode.
However, for "old mode" and "deleted file mode", there is a minor
annoyance. We compare the patch's expected preimage mode with the
current state. But that current state is always going to be a canonical
mode itself:
- updating an index entry via --cached will have the canonical mode in
the index
- for updating a working tree file, check_preimage() runs the mode
through ce_mode_from_stat(), which does the usual canonicalization
So if the patch feeds a non-canonical mode, it's impossible for it to
match, and we will always complain with something like:
file has type 100644, expected 100664
Since this is just a warning, the operation proceeds, but it's
confusing and annoying.
These cases should be pretty rare in practice. Git would never produce a
patch with non-canonical modes itself (since it doesn't store them).
And while we do accept patches from other programs, all of those lines
were invented by Git. So you'd need a program trying to be Git
compatible, but not handling canonicalization the same way. Reportedly
"quilt" is such a program.
We should canonicalize the modes as we read them so that the user never
sees the useless warning.
A few notes on the tests:
- I've covered instances of all lines for completeness, even though
the "new mode" / "new file mode" ones behave OK currently.
- the tests apply patches to both the index and working tree, and
check the result of both. Again, we know that all of these paths
canonicalize anyway, but it's giving us extra coverage (although we
are even less likely to have such a bug now since we canonicalize up
front).
- the test patches are missing "index" lines, which is also something
Git would never produce. But they don't matter for the test, they do
match the case from quilt we saw in the wild, and they avoid some
sha1/sha256 complexity.
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git apply" on a filesystem without filemode support have learned
to take a hint from what is in the index for the path, even when
not working with the "--index" or "--cached" option, when checking
the executable bit match what is required by the preimage in the
patch.
* cp/apply-core-filemode:
apply: code simplification
apply: correctly reverse patch's pre- and post-image mode bits
apply: ignore working tree filemode when !core.filemode
Piping the output of git commands like git-ls-files to another
command (grep in this case) hides the exit code returned by
these commands. Prevent this by storing the output of git-ls-files
to a temporary file and then "grep-ping" from that file. Replace
grep with test_grep as the latter is more verbose when it fails.
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When applying a patch that adds an executable file, git apply
ignores the core.fileMode setting (core.fileMode in git config
specifies whether the executable bit on files in the working tree
should be honored or not) resulting in warnings like:
warning: script.sh has type 100644, expected 100755
even when core.fileMode is set to false, which is undesired. This
is extra true for systems like Windows.
Fix this by inferring the correct file mode from either the existing
index entry, and when it is unavailable, assuming that the file mode
was OK by pretending it had the mode that the preimage wants to see,
when core.filemode is set to false. Add a test case that verifies
the change and prevents future regression.
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.
This patch was produced more or less with
git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'
and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark some tests that match "*apply*" as passing when git is compiled
with SANITIZE=leak. They'll now be listed as running under the
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI
target).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running this test in Cygwin, it's necessary to remove the inherited
access control lists from the Git working directory in order for later
permissions tests to work as expected.
As such, fix an error in the test script so that the ACLs are set for
the working directory, not a nonexistent subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
core.sharedRepository defines which permissions Git should set when
creating files in $GIT_DIR, so that the repository may be shared with
other users. But (in its current form) the setting shouldn't affect how
files are created in the working tree. This is not respected by apply
and am (which uses apply), when creating leading directories:
$ cat d.patch
diff --git a/d/f b/d/f
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
Apply without the setting:
$ umask 0077
$ git apply d.patch
$ ls -ld d
drwx------
Apply with the setting:
$ umask 0077
$ git -c core.sharedRepository=0770 apply d.patch
$ ls -ld d
drwxrws---
Only the leading directories are affected. That's because they are
created with safe_create_leading_directories(), which calls
adjust_shared_perm() to set the directories' permissions based on
core.sharedRepository. To fix that, let's introduce a variant of this
function that ignores the setting, and use it in apply. Also add a
regression test and a note in the function documentation about the use
of each variant according to the destination (working tree or git
dir).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An empty string as mode specification is accepted silently by git apply,
as Vegard Nossum found out using AFL. It's interpreted as zero. Reject
such bogus file modes, and only accept ones consisting exclusively of
octal digits.
Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way, test authors don't need to remember to source
lib-prereq-FILEMODE.sh before using the FILEMODE prereq to guard tests
that rely on the executable bit being honored when checking out files.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the five tests that were all checking "git config --bool
core.filemode" to use a new FILEMODE prerequisite in
lib-prereq-FILEMODE.sh.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A git patch that does not change the executable bit records the mode bits
on its "index" line. "git apply" used to interpret this mode exactly the
same way as it interprets the mode recorded on "new mode" line, as the
wish by the patch submitter to set the mode to the one recorded on the
line.
The reason the mode does not agree between the submitter and the receiver
in the first place is because there is _another_ commit that only appears
on one side but not the other since their histories diverged, and that
commit changes the mode. The patch has "index" line but not "new mode"
line because its change is about updating the contents without affecting
the mode. The application of such a patch is an explicit wish by the
submitter to only cherry-pick the commit that updates the contents without
cherry-picking the commit that modifies the mode. Viewed this way, the
current behaviour is problematic, even though the command does warn when
the mode of the path being patched does not match this mode, and a careful
user could detect this inconsistencies between the patch submitter and the
patch receiver.
This changes the semantics of the mode recorded on the "index" line;
instead of interpreting it as the submitter's wish to set the mode to the
recorded value, it merely informs what the mode submitter happened to
have, and the presense of the "index" line is taken as submitter's wish to
keep whatever the mode is on the receiving end.
This is based on the patch originally done by Alexander Potashev with a
minor fix; the tests are mine.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
