Move `reftable_table_print()` into the "dump-reftable" helper. This
follows the same reasoning as the preceding commit.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move functions relating to the reftable iterator from "generic.c" into
"iter.c". This prepares for the removal of the former subsystem.
While at it, remove some unneeded braces to conform to our coding style.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refactor the interfaces exposed by `struct reftable_table` and `struct
reftable_iterator` such that they support iterator reuse. This is done
by separating initialization of the iterator and seeking on it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reftable iterators are created by seeking on the parent structure of a
corresponding record. For example, to create an iterator for the merged
table you would call `reftable_merged_table_seek_ref()`. Most notably,
it is not posible to create an iterator and then seek it afterwards.
While this may be a bit easier to reason about, it comes with two
significant downsides. The first downside is that the logic to find
records is split up between the parent data structure and the iterator
itself. Conceptually, it is more straight forward if all that logic was
contained in a single place, which should be the iterator.
The second and more significant downside is that it is impossible to
reuse iterators for multiple seeks. Whenever you want to look up a
record, you need to re-create the whole infrastructure again, which is
quite a waste of time. Furthermore, it is impossible to optimize seeks,
such as when seeking the same record multiple times.
To address this, we essentially split up the concerns properly such that
the parent data structure is responsible for setting up the iterator via
a new `init_iter()` callback, whereas the iterator handles seeks via a
new `seek()` callback. This will eventually allow us to call `seek()` on
the iterator multiple times, where every iterator can potentially
optimize for certain cases.
Note that at this point in time we are not yet ready to reuse the
iterators. This will be left for a future patch series.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Each of these were checked with
gcc -E -I. ${SOURCE_FILE} | grep ${HEADER_FILE}
to ensure that removing the direct inclusion of the header actually
resulted in that header no longer being included at all (i.e. that
no other header pulled it in transitively).
...except for a few cases where we verified that although the header
was brought in transitively, nothing from it was directly used in
that source file. These cases were:
* builtin/credential-cache.c
* builtin/pull.c
* builtin/send-pack.c
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the assignment syntax introduced in 66c0dabab5 (reftable: make
reftable_record a tagged union, 2022-01-20) to be portable to AIX xlc
v12.1:
avar@gcc111:[/home/avar]xlc -qversion
IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1 (5765-J02, 5725-C72)
Version: 12.01.0000.0000
The error emitted before this was e.g.:
"reftable/generic.c", line 133.26: 1506-196 (S) Initialization
between types "char*" and "struct reftable_ref_record" is not
allowed.
The syntax in the pre-image is supported by e.g. xlc 13.01 on a newer
AIX version:
avar@gcc119:[/home/avar]xlc -qversion
IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V13.1.3 (5725-C72, 5765-J07)
Version: 13.01.0003.0006
But as we've otherwise supported this compiler let's not break it
entirely if it's easy to work around it.
Suggested-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reduces the amount of glue code, because we don't need a void
pointer or vtable within the structure.
The only snag is that reftable_index_record contain a strbuf, so it
cannot be zero-initialized. To address this, use reftable_new_record()
to return fresh instance, given a record type. Since
reftable_new_record() doesn't cause heap allocation anymore, it should
be balanced with reftable_record_release() rather than
reftable_record_destroy().
Thanks to Peff for the suggestion.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
