When we run a test helper function in test_submodule_switch_common(), we
sometimes specify a whole helper function as the $command. When we do
this, in some test cases, we just mark the whole function with
`test_must_fail`. However, it's possible that the helper function might
fail earlier or later than expected due to an introduced bug. If this
happens, then the test case will still report as passing but it should
really be marked as failing since it didn't actually display the
intended behaviour.
Instead of invoking $command as one monolithic helper function, break it
up into three parts:
1. $command which is always a git command.
2. $before which is a callback function that runs just prior to
$command.
3. $after which is a callback function that runs just after
$command.
If the command requires a filename argument, specify it as `\$arg` since
that variable will be set and the whole $command string will be eval'd.
Unfortunately, there is no way to get rid of the eval as some of the
commands that are passed (such as the `git pull` tests) require that no
additional arguments are passed so we must have some mechanism for the
caller to specify whether or not it wants the filename argument.
The $before and $after callback functions will be passed the filename as
the first arg. These callback functions are optional and, if missing,
will be replaced with `true`. Also, in the case where we have a
`test_must_fail` test, $after will not be executed, similar to how the
helper functions currently behave when the git command fails and exits
the &&-chain.
Finally, as an added bonus, `test_must_fail` will only run on $command
which is guaranteed to be a git command.
An alternate design was considered where $OVERWRITING_FAIL is set from
test_submodule_switch_common() and exposed to the helper function. This
approach was considered too difficult to understand due to the fact that
using a signalling magic environment variable might be too indirect.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since all invocations of test_submodule_forced_switch() are git
commands, automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common().
Similarly, many invocations of test_submodule_switch() are also git
commands so automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common() as well.
Finally, for invocations of test_submodule_switch() that invoke a custom
function, rename the old function to test_submodule_switch_func().
This is necessary because in a future commit, we will be adding some
logic that needs to distinguish between an invocation of a plain git
comamnd and an invocation of a test helper function.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since ff6f1f564 (submodule-config: lazy-load a repository's .gitmodules
file, 2017-08-03) rebase interactive fails if there are any submodules
with unstaged changes which have been configured with a value for
'submodule.<name>.ignore' in the repository's config.
This is due to how configured values of 'submodule.<name>.ignore' are
handled in addition to a change in how the submodule config is loaded.
When the diff machinery hits a submodule (gitlink as well as a
corresponding entry in the submodule subsystem) it will read the value
of 'submodule.<name>.ignore' stored in the repository's config and if
the config is present it will clear the 'IGNORE_SUBMODULES' (which is
the flag explicitly requested by rebase interactive),
'IGNORE_UNTRACKED_IN_SUBMODULES', and 'IGNORE_DIRTY_SUBMODULES' diff
flags and then set one of them based on the configured value.
Historically this wasn't a problem because the submodule subsystem
wasn't initialized because the .gitmodules file wasn't explicitly loaded
by the rebase interactive command. So when the diff machinery hit a
submodule it would skip over reading any configured values of
'submodule.<name>.ignore'.
In order to preserve the behavior of submodules being ignored by rebase
interactive, also set the 'OVERRIDE_SUBMODULE_CONFIG' diff flag when
submodules are requested to be ignored when checking for unstaged
changes.
Reported-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a submodule is being merged or cherry-picked into a working
tree that already contains a corresponding empty directory, do not
record a conflict.
One situation where this bug appears is:
- Commit 1 adds a submodule
- Commit 2 removes that submodule and re-adds it into a subdirectory
(sub1 to sub1/sub1).
- Commit 3 adds an unrelated file.
Now the user checks out commit 1 (first deinitializing the submodule),
and attempts to cherry-pick commit 3. Previously, this would fail,
because the incoming submodule sub1/sub1 would falsely conflict with
the empty sub1 directory.
This patch ignores the empty sub1 directory, fixing the bug. We only
ignore the empty directory if the object being emplaced is a
submodule, which expects an empty directory.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test that the rebase command updates the work tree as expected for
changes which don't result in conflicts. To make that work add two
helper functions that add a commit only touching files and then
revert it. This allows to rebase the target commit over these two
and to compare the result.
Set KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_DOESNT_CREATE_EMPTY_SUBMODULE_DIR to
document that "replace directory with submodule" fails for an
interactive rebase because a directory "sub1" already exists.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
