Add a new option `reftable.blockSize` that allows the user to control
the block size used by the reftable library.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 606e088d5d (update-index: add --show-index-version, 2023-09-12), we
added the new '--show-index-version' option to 'git-update-index' and
documented it, but forgot to add it to the synopsis section.
Add '--show-index-version' to the synopsis of 'git-update-index'.
Signed-off-by: Dov Murik <dov.murik@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Explain a full lifecycle of a patch series upfront, so that it is
clear when key decisions to "accept" a series is made and how a new
patch series becomes a part of a new release.
Fold the "you need to monitor the progress of your topic" section
into the primary "patch lifecycle" section, as that is one of the
things the patch submitter is responsible for. It is not like "I
sent a patch and responded to review messages, and now it is their
problem". They need to see their patch through the patch life
cycle.
Earlier versions of this document outlined a slightly different
patch flow in an idealized world, where the original submitter
gathered agreements from the participants of the discussion and sent
the final "we all agreed that this is the good version--please
apply" patches to the maintainer. In practice, this almost never
happened. Instead, describe what flow was used in practice for the
past decade that worked well for us.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before discussing the small details of how the patch gets sent, we'd
want to give people a larger picture first to set the expectation
straight. The existing patch-flow section covers materials that are
suitable for that purpose, so move it to the beginning of the
document. We'll update the contents of the section to clarify what
goal the patch submitter is working towards in the next step, which
will make it easier to understand the reason behind the individual
rules presented in latter parts of the document.
This step only moves two sections (patch-flow and patch-status)
without changing their contents, except that their section levels
are demoted from Level 1 to Level 2 to fit better in the document
structure at their new place.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The color parsing code learned to handle 12-bit RGB colors, spelled
as "#RGB" (in addition to "#RRGGBB" that is already supported).
* bb/rgb-12-bit-colors:
color: add support for 12-bit RGB colors
t/t4026-color: add test coverage for invalid RGB colors
t/t4026-color: remove an extra double quote character
The credential helper protocol, together with the HTTP layer, have
been enhanced to support authentication schemes different from
username & password pair, like Bearer and NTLM.
* bc/credential-scheme-enhancement:
credential: add method for querying capabilities
credential-cache: implement authtype capability
t: add credential tests for authtype
credential: add support for multistage credential rounds
t5563: refactor for multi-stage authentication
docs: set a limit on credential line length
credential: enable state capability
credential: add an argument to keep state
http: add support for authtype and credential
docs: indicate new credential protocol fields
credential: add a field called "ephemeral"
credential: gate new fields on capability
credential: add a field for pre-encoded credentials
http: use new headers for each object request
remote-curl: reset headers on new request
credential: add an authtype field
Add an entry in the 'merge-tree' builtin documentation for
-X/--strategy-option (added in 6a4c9e7b32 (merge-tree: add -X strategy
option, 2023-09-24)). The same option is documented for 'merge', 'rebase',
'revert', etc. in their respective Documentation/ files, so let's do the
same for 'merge-tree'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-tag supports interpreting trailers from an annotated tag message,
using --list --format="%(trailers)". However, the available methods to
add a trailer to a tag message (namely -F or --editor) are not as
ergonomic.
In a previous patch, we moved git-commit's implementation of its
--trailer option to the trailer.h API. Let's use that new function to
teach git-tag the same --trailer option, emulating as much of
git-commit's behavior as much as possible.
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: John Passaro <john.a.passaro@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'reference-transaction' hook runs whenever a reference update is
made to the system. In a previous commit, we added the `old_target` and
`new_target` fields to the `reference_transaction_update()`. In
following commits we'll also add the code to handle symref's in the
reference backends.
Support symrefs also in the 'reference-transaction' hook, by modifying
the current format:
<old-oid> SP <new-oid> SP <ref-name> LF
to be be:
<old-value> SP <new-value> SP <ref-name> LF
where for regular refs the output would not change and remain the same.
But when either 'old-value' or 'new-value' is a symref, we print the ref
as 'ref:<ref-target>'.
This does break backward compatibility, but the 'reference-transaction'
hook's documentation always stated that support for symbolic references
may be added in the future.
We do not add any tests in this commit since there is no git command
which activates this flow, in an upcoming commit, we'll start using
transaction based symref updates as the default, we'll add tests there
for the hook too.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The syntax for refspecs are explained in more detail in documention for
git-fetch and git-push. Give a hint to the user too look there more fore
information
Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We see too often that a range-diff added to format-patch output
shows too many "unmatched" patches. This is because the default
value for creation-factor is set to a relatively low value.
It may be justified for other uses (like you have a yet-to-be-sent
new iteration of your series, and compare it against the 'seen'
branch that has an older iteration, probably with the '--left-only'
option, to pick out only your patches while ignoring the others) of
"range-diff" command, but when the command is run as part of the
format-patch, the user _knows_ and expects that the patches in the
old and the new iterations roughly correspond to each other, so we
can and should use a much higher default.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "edit" subcommand to git-config(1). Please refer to
preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "remove-section" subcommand to git-config(1). Please
refer to preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "rename-section" subcommand to git-config(1). Please
refer to preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "unset" subcommand to git-config(1). Please refer to
preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "set" subcommand to git-config(1). Please refer to
preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "get" subcommand to git-config(1). Please refer to
preceding commits regarding the motivation behind this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While git-config(1) has several modes, those modes are not exposed with
subcommands but instead by specifying action flags like `--unset` or
`--list`. This user interface is not really in line with how our more
modern commands work, where it is a lot more customary to say e.g. `git
remote list`. Furthermore, to add to the confusion, git-config(1) also
allows the user to request modes implicitly by just specifying the
correct number of arguments. Thus, `git config foo.bar` will retrieve
the value of "foo.bar" while `git config foo.bar baz` will set it to
"baz".
Overall, this makes for a confusing interface that could really use a
makeover. It hurts discoverability of what you can do with git-config(1)
and is comparatively easy to get wrong. Converting the command to have
subcommands instead would go a long way to help address these issues.
One concern in this context is backwards compatibility. Luckily, we can
introduce subcommands without breaking backwards compatibility at all.
This is because all the implicit modes of git-config(1) require that the
first argument is a properly formatted config key. And as config keys
_must_ have a dot in their name, any value without a dot would have been
discarded by git-config(1) previous to this change. Thus, given that
none of the subcommands do have a dot, they are unambiguous.
Introduce the first such new subcommand, which is "git config list". To
retain backwards compatibility we only conditionally use subcommands and
will fall back to the old syntax in case no subcommand was detected.
This should help to transition to the new-style syntax until we
eventually deprecate and remove the old-style syntax.
Note that the way we handle this we're duplicating some functionality
across old and new syntax. While this isn't pretty, it helps us to
ensure that there really is no change in behaviour for the old syntax.
Amend tests such that we run them both with old and new style syntax.
As tests are now run twice, state from the first run may be still be
around in the second run and thus cause tests to fail. Add cleanup logic
as required to fix such tests.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Advice hints must be disabled individually by setting the relevant
advice.* variables to false in the Git configuration. For server-side
and scripted usages of Git where hints can be a hindrance, it can be
cumbersome to maintain configuration to ensure all advice hints are
disabled in perpetuity. This is a particular concern in tests, where
new or changed hints can result in failed assertions.
Add a --no-advice global option to disable all advice hints from being
displayed. This is independent of the toggles for individual advice
hints. Use an internal environment variable (GIT_ADVICE) to ensure this
configuration is propagated to the usage site, even if it executes in a
subprocess.
Signed-off-by: James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the documentation page consistent with the usage string printed by
"git help git" and consistent with the description of "[-v | --version]"
option.
Signed-off-by: James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We'll be adding another option to the --no-* class of options soon.
Clean up the existing options by grouping them together in the OPTIONS
section, and adding missing ones to the SYNOPSIS.
Signed-off-by: James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
RGB color parsing currently supports 24-bit values in the form #RRGGBB.
As in Cascading Style Sheets (CSS [1]), also allow to specify an RGB color
using only three digits with #RGB.
In this shortened form, each of the digits is – again, as in CSS –
duplicated to convert the color to 24 bits, e.g. #f1b specifies the same
color as #ff11bb.
In color.h, remove the '0x' prefix in the example to match the actual
syntax.
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/hex-color
Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git rev-parse" is run with the "--is-inside-work-tree" option
and friends outside a Git repository, the command exits with a
non-zero status and says "fatal: not a repository". While it is not
wrong per-se, in the sense that it is useless to learn if we are
inside or outside a working tree in the first place when we are not
even in a repository, it could be argued that they should emit
"false" and exit with status 0, as they cannot possibly be "true".
As the current behaviour has been with us for a decade or more
since it was introduced in Git 1.5.3 timeframe, it is too late to
change it.
And arguably, the current behaviour is easier to use if you want to
distinguish among three states, i.e.,
(1) the cwd is not controlled by Git at all
(2) the cwd is inside a working tree
(3) the cwd is not inside a working tree (e.g., .git/hooks/)
with a single invocation of the command by doing
if inout=$(git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree)
then
case "$inout" in
true) : in a working tree ;;
false) : not in a working tree ;;
esac
else
: not in a repository
fi
So, let's document clearly that the command will die() when run
outside a repository in general, unless in some special cases like
when the command is in the --parseopt mode.
While at it, update the introductory text that makes it sound as if
the primary operating mode is the only operating mode of the
command, which was written long before we added "--parseopt" and
"--sq-quote" modes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A scheduled "git maintenance" job is expected to work on all
repositories it knows about, but it stopped at the first one that
errored out. Now it keeps going.
* js/for-each-repo-keep-going:
maintenance: running maintenance should not stop on errors
for-each-repo: optionally keep going on an error
Advertise "git contacts", a tool for newcomers to find people to
ask review for their patches, a bit more in our developer
documentation.
* la/doc-use-of-contacts-when-contributing:
SubmittingPatches: demonstrate using git-contacts with git-send-email
SubmittingPatches: add heading for format-patch and send-email
SubmittingPatches: dedupe discussion of security patches
SubmittingPatches: discuss reviewers first
SubmittingPatches: quote commands
SubmittingPatches: mention GitGitGadget
SubmittingPatches: clarify 'git-contacts' location
MyFirstContribution: mention contrib/contacts/git-contacts
The "--rfc" option of "git format-patch" learned to take an
optional string value to be used in place of "RFC" to tweak the
"[PATCH]" on the subject header.
* jc/format-patch-rfc-more:
format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)]
format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP
* maint-2.44: (41 commits)
Git 2.44.1
Git 2.43.4
Git 2.42.2
Git 2.41.1
Git 2.40.2
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
...
The `SubmittingPatches` documentation briefly mentions that related
patches should be grouped together in their own e-mail thread. Expand on
this to explicitly state that updated versions of a patch series should
also follow this. Also provide add a link to existing documentation from
`MyFirstContribution` that provides detailed instructions on how to do
this via `git-send-email(1)`.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In https://github.com/microsoft/git/issues/623, it was reported that
the regularly scheduled maintenance stops if one repo in the middle of
the list was found to be missing.
This is undesirable, and points out a gap in the design of `git
for-each-repo`: We need a mode where that command does not stop on an
error, but continues to try running the specified command with the other
repositories.
Imitating the `--keep-going` option of GNU make, this commit teaches
`for-each-repo` the same trick: to continue with the operation on all
the remaining repositories in case there was a problem with one
repository, still setting the exit code to indicate an error occurred.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "receive-pack" program (which responds to "git push") was not
converted to run "git maintenance --auto" when other codepaths that
used to run "git gc --auto" were updated, which has been corrected.
* ps/run-auto-maintenance-in-receive-pack:
builtin/receive-pack: convert to use git-maintenance(1)
run-command: introduce function to prepare auto-maintenance process
The way "git fast-import" handles paths described in its input has
been tightened up and more clearly documented.
* ta/fast-import-parse-path-fix:
fast-import: make comments more precise
fast-import: forbid escaped NUL in paths
fast-import: document C-style escapes for paths
fast-import: improve documentation for path quoting
fast-import: remove dead strbuf
fast-import: allow unquoted empty path for root
fast-import: directly use strbufs for paths
fast-import: tighten path unquoting
In the previous step, the "--rfc" option of "format-patch" learned
to take an optional string value to prepend to the subject prefix,
so that --rfc=WIP can give "[WIP PATCH]".
There may be cases in which the extra string wants to come after the
subject prefix. Extend the mechanism to allow "--rfc=-(WIP)" [*] to
signal that the extra string is to be appended instead of getting
prepended, resulting in "[PATCH (WIP)]".
In the documentation, discourage (ab)using "--rfc=-RFC" to say
"[PATCH RFC]" just to be different, when "[RFC PATCH]" is the norm.
[Footnote]
* The syntax takes inspiration from Perl's open syntax that opens
pipes "open fh, '|-', 'cmd'", where the dash signals "the other
stuff comes here".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the "--rfc" option, we can tweak the "[PATCH]" (or whatever
string specified with the "--subject-prefix" option, instead of
"PATCH") that we prefix the title of the commit with into "[RFC
PATCH]", but some projects may want "[rfc PATCH]". Adding a new
option, e.g., "--rfc-lowercase", to support such need every time
somebody wants to use different strings would lead to insanity of
accumulating unbounded number of such options.
Allow an optional value specified for the option, so that users can
use "--rfc=rfc" (think of "--rfc" without value as a short-hand for
"--rfc=RFC") if they wanted to.
This can of course be (ab)used to make the prefix "[WIP PATCH]" by
passing "--rfc=WIP". Passing an empty string, i.e., "--rfc=", is
the same as "--no-rfc" to override an option given earlier on the
same command line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The changelog entry for the new `git pack-refs --auto` mode only says
that the new flag is useful, but doesn't really say what it does. Add
some more information.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
