The `git range-diff` command can be quite expensive, which is not a surprise given that the underlying algorithm to match up pairs of commits between the provided two commit ranges has a cubic runtime. Therefore it makes sense to restrict the commit ranges as much as possible, to reduce the amount of input to that O(N^3) algorithm. In chatty repositories with wide trees, this is not necessarily possible merely by choosing commit ranges wisely. Let's give users another option to restrict the commit ranges: by providing a pathspec. That helps in repositories with wide trees because it is likely that the user has a good idea which subset of the tree they are actually interested in. Example: git range-diff upstream/main upstream/seen HEAD -- range-diff.c This shows commits that are either in the local branch or in `seen`, but not in `main`, skipping all commits that do not touch `range-diff.c`. Note: Since we piggy-back the pathspecs onto the `other_arg` mechanism that was introduced to be able to pass through the `--notes` option to the revision machinery, we must now ensure that the `other_arg` array is appended at the end (the revision range must come before the pathspecs, if any). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			298 lines
		
	
	
		
			10 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			298 lines
		
	
	
		
			10 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
git-range-diff(1)
 | 
						|
=================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
NAME
 | 
						|
----
 | 
						|
git-range-diff - Compare two commit ranges (e.g. two versions of a branch)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
SYNOPSIS
 | 
						|
--------
 | 
						|
[verse]
 | 
						|
'git range-diff' [--color=[<when>]] [--no-color] [<diff-options>]
 | 
						|
	[--no-dual-color] [--creation-factor=<factor>]
 | 
						|
	[--left-only | --right-only]
 | 
						|
	( <range1> <range2> | <rev1>...<rev2> | <base> <rev1> <rev2> )
 | 
						|
	[[--] <path>...]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
DESCRIPTION
 | 
						|
-----------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This command shows the differences between two versions of a patch
 | 
						|
series, or more generally, two commit ranges (ignoring merge commits).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In the presence of `<path>` arguments, these commit ranges are limited
 | 
						|
accordingly.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To that end, it first finds pairs of commits from both commit ranges
 | 
						|
that correspond with each other. Two commits are said to correspond when
 | 
						|
the diff between their patches (i.e. the author information, the commit
 | 
						|
message and the commit diff) is reasonably small compared to the
 | 
						|
patches' size. See ``Algorithm`` below for details.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Finally, the list of matching commits is shown in the order of the
 | 
						|
second commit range, with unmatched commits being inserted just after
 | 
						|
all of their ancestors have been shown.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
There are three ways to specify the commit ranges:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
- `<range1> <range2>`: Either commit range can be of the form
 | 
						|
  `<base>..<rev>`, `<rev>^!` or `<rev>^-<n>`. See `SPECIFYING RANGES`
 | 
						|
  in linkgit:gitrevisions[7] for more details.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
- `<rev1>...<rev2>`. This is equivalent to
 | 
						|
  `<rev2>..<rev1> <rev1>..<rev2>`.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
- `<base> <rev1> <rev2>`: This is equivalent to `<base>..<rev1>
 | 
						|
  <base>..<rev2>`.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
OPTIONS
 | 
						|
-------
 | 
						|
--no-dual-color::
 | 
						|
	When the commit diffs differ, `git range-diff` recreates the
 | 
						|
	original diffs' coloring, and adds outer -/+ diff markers with
 | 
						|
	the *background* being red/green to make it easier to see e.g.
 | 
						|
	when there was a change in what exact lines were added.
 | 
						|
+
 | 
						|
Additionally, the commit diff lines that are only present in the first commit
 | 
						|
range are shown "dimmed" (this can be overridden using the `color.diff.<slot>`
 | 
						|
config setting where `<slot>` is one of `contextDimmed`, `oldDimmed` and
 | 
						|
`newDimmed`), and the commit diff lines that are only present in the second
 | 
						|
commit range are shown in bold (which can be overridden using the config
 | 
						|
settings `color.diff.<slot>` with `<slot>` being one of `contextBold`,
 | 
						|
`oldBold` or `newBold`).
 | 
						|
+
 | 
						|
This is known to `range-diff` as "dual coloring". Use `--no-dual-color`
 | 
						|
to revert to color all lines according to the outer diff markers
 | 
						|
(and completely ignore the inner diff when it comes to color).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
--creation-factor=<percent>::
 | 
						|
	Set the creation/deletion cost fudge factor to `<percent>`.
 | 
						|
	Defaults to 60. Try a larger value if `git range-diff` erroneously
 | 
						|
	considers a large change a total rewrite (deletion of one commit
 | 
						|
	and addition of another), and a smaller one in the reverse case.
 | 
						|
	See the ``Algorithm`` section below for an explanation why this is
 | 
						|
	needed.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
--left-only::
 | 
						|
	Suppress commits that are missing from the first specified range
 | 
						|
	(or the "left range" when using the `<rev1>...<rev2>` format).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
--right-only::
 | 
						|
	Suppress commits that are missing from the second specified range
 | 
						|
	(or the "right range" when using the `<rev1>...<rev2>` format).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
--[no-]notes[=<ref>]::
 | 
						|
	This flag is passed to the `git log` program
 | 
						|
	(see linkgit:git-log[1]) that generates the patches.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
<range1> <range2>::
 | 
						|
	Compare the commits specified by the two ranges, where
 | 
						|
	`<range1>` is considered an older version of `<range2>`.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
<rev1>...<rev2>::
 | 
						|
	Equivalent to passing `<rev2>..<rev1>` and `<rev1>..<rev2>`.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
<base> <rev1> <rev2>::
 | 
						|
	Equivalent to passing `<base>..<rev1>` and `<base>..<rev2>`.
 | 
						|
	Note that `<base>` does not need to be the exact branch point
 | 
						|
	of the branches. Example: after rebasing a branch `my-topic`,
 | 
						|
	`git range-diff my-topic@{u} my-topic@{1} my-topic` would
 | 
						|
	show the differences introduced by the rebase.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
`git range-diff` also accepts the regular diff options (see
 | 
						|
linkgit:git-diff[1]), most notably the `--color=[<when>]` and
 | 
						|
`--no-color` options. These options are used when generating the "diff
 | 
						|
between patches", i.e. to compare the author, commit message and diff of
 | 
						|
corresponding old/new commits. There is currently no means to tweak most of the
 | 
						|
diff options passed to `git log` when generating those patches.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
OUTPUT STABILITY
 | 
						|
----------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The output of the `range-diff` command is subject to change. It is
 | 
						|
intended to be human-readable porcelain output, not something that can
 | 
						|
be used across versions of Git to get a textually stable `range-diff`
 | 
						|
(as opposed to something like the `--stable` option to
 | 
						|
linkgit:git-patch-id[1]). There's also no equivalent of
 | 
						|
linkgit:git-apply[1] for `range-diff`, the output is not intended to
 | 
						|
be machine-readable.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This is particularly true when passing in diff options. Currently some
 | 
						|
options like `--stat` can, as an emergent effect, produce output
 | 
						|
that's quite useless in the context of `range-diff`. Future versions
 | 
						|
of `range-diff` may learn to interpret such options in a manner
 | 
						|
specific to `range-diff` (e.g. for `--stat` producing human-readable
 | 
						|
output which summarizes how the diffstat changed).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
CONFIGURATION
 | 
						|
-------------
 | 
						|
This command uses the `diff.color.*` and `pager.range-diff` settings
 | 
						|
(the latter is on by default).
 | 
						|
See linkgit:git-config[1].
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
EXAMPLES
 | 
						|
--------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
When a rebase required merge conflicts to be resolved, compare the changes
 | 
						|
introduced by the rebase directly afterwards using:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
$ git range-diff @{u} @{1} @
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A typical output of `git range-diff` would look like this:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
-:  ------- > 1:  0ddba11 Prepare for the inevitable!
 | 
						|
1:  c0debee = 2:  cab005e Add a helpful message at the start
 | 
						|
2:  f00dbal ! 3:  decafe1 Describe a bug
 | 
						|
    @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 | 
						|
     Author: A U Thor <author@example.com>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    -TODO: Describe a bug
 | 
						|
    +Describe a bug
 | 
						|
    @@ -324,5 +324,6
 | 
						|
      This is expected.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    -+What is unexpected is that it will also crash.
 | 
						|
    ++Unexpectedly, it also crashes. This is a bug, and the jury is
 | 
						|
    ++still out there how to fix it best. See ticket #314 for details.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Contact
 | 
						|
3:  bedead < -:  ------- TO-UNDO
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In this example, there are 3 old and 3 new commits, where the developer
 | 
						|
removed the 3rd, added a new one before the first two, and modified the
 | 
						|
commit message of the 2nd commit as well its diff.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
When the output goes to a terminal, it is color-coded by default, just
 | 
						|
like regular `git diff`'s output. In addition, the first line (adding a
 | 
						|
commit) is green, the last line (deleting a commit) is red, the second
 | 
						|
line (with a perfect match) is yellow like the commit header of `git
 | 
						|
show`'s output, and the third line colors the old commit red, the new
 | 
						|
one green and the rest like `git show`'s commit header.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A naive color-coded diff of diffs is actually a bit hard to read,
 | 
						|
though, as it colors the entire lines red or green. The line that added
 | 
						|
"What is unexpected" in the old commit, for example, is completely red,
 | 
						|
even if the intent of the old commit was to add something.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To help with that, `range` uses the `--dual-color` mode by default. In
 | 
						|
this mode, the diff of diffs will retain the original diff colors, and
 | 
						|
prefix the lines with -/+ markers that have their *background* red or
 | 
						|
green, to make it more obvious that they describe how the diff itself
 | 
						|
changed.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Algorithm
 | 
						|
---------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The general idea is this: we generate a cost matrix between the commits
 | 
						|
in both commit ranges, then solve the least-cost assignment.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The cost matrix is populated thusly: for each pair of commits, both
 | 
						|
diffs are generated and the "diff of diffs" is generated, with 3 context
 | 
						|
lines, then the number of lines in that diff is used as cost.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To avoid false positives (e.g. when a patch has been removed, and an
 | 
						|
unrelated patch has been added between two iterations of the same patch
 | 
						|
series), the cost matrix is extended to allow for that, by adding
 | 
						|
fixed-cost entries for wholesale deletes/adds.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Example: Let commits `1--2` be the first iteration of a patch series and
 | 
						|
`A--C` the second iteration. Let's assume that `A` is a cherry-pick of
 | 
						|
`2,` and `C` is a cherry-pick of `1` but with a small modification (say,
 | 
						|
a fixed typo). Visualize the commits as a bipartite graph:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
    1            A
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    2            B
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		 C
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
We are looking for a "best" explanation of the new series in terms of
 | 
						|
the old one. We can represent an "explanation" as an edge in the graph:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
    1            A
 | 
						|
	       /
 | 
						|
    2 --------'  B
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
		 C
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This explanation comes for "free" because there was no change. Similarly
 | 
						|
`C` could be explained using `1`, but that comes at some cost c>0
 | 
						|
because of the modification:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
    1 ----.      A
 | 
						|
	  |    /
 | 
						|
    2 ----+---'  B
 | 
						|
	  |
 | 
						|
	  `----- C
 | 
						|
	  c>0
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In mathematical terms, what we are looking for is some sort of a minimum
 | 
						|
cost bipartite matching; `1` is matched to `C` at some cost, etc. The
 | 
						|
underlying graph is in fact a complete bipartite graph; the cost we
 | 
						|
associate with every edge is the size of the diff between the two
 | 
						|
commits' patches. To explain also new commits, we introduce dummy nodes
 | 
						|
on both sides:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
    1 ----.      A
 | 
						|
	  |    /
 | 
						|
    2 ----+---'  B
 | 
						|
	  |
 | 
						|
    o     `----- C
 | 
						|
	  c>0
 | 
						|
    o            o
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    o            o
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The cost of an edge `o--C` is the size of `C`'s diff, modified by a
 | 
						|
fudge factor that should be smaller than 100%. The cost of an edge
 | 
						|
`o--o` is free. The fudge factor is necessary because even if `1` and
 | 
						|
`C` have nothing in common, they may still share a few empty lines and
 | 
						|
such, possibly making the assignment `1--C`, `o--o` slightly cheaper
 | 
						|
than `1--o`, `o--C` even if `1` and `C` have nothing in common. With the
 | 
						|
fudge factor we require a much larger common part to consider patches as
 | 
						|
corresponding.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The overall time needed to compute this algorithm is the time needed to
 | 
						|
compute n+m commit diffs and then n*m diffs of patches, plus the time
 | 
						|
needed to compute the least-cost assignment between n and m diffs. Git
 | 
						|
uses an implementation of the Jonker-Volgenant algorithm to solve the
 | 
						|
assignment problem, which has cubic runtime complexity. The matching
 | 
						|
found in this case will look like this:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
    1 ----.      A
 | 
						|
	  |    /
 | 
						|
    2 ----+---'  B
 | 
						|
       .--+-----'
 | 
						|
    o -'  `----- C
 | 
						|
	  c>0
 | 
						|
    o ---------- o
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    o ---------- o
 | 
						|
------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
SEE ALSO
 | 
						|
--------
 | 
						|
linkgit:git-log[1]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
GIT
 | 
						|
---
 | 
						|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
 |