 b31222cfb7
			
		
	
	b31222cfb7
	
	
	
		
			
			The current technical documentation for the packfile protocol is both sparse and incorrect. This documents the fetch-pack/upload-pack and send-pack/ receive-pack protocols much more fully. Add documentation from Shawn's upcoming http-protocol docs that is shared by the packfile protocol. protocol-common.txt describes ABNF notation amendments, refname rules and the packet line format. Add documentation on the various capabilities supported by the upload-pack and receive-pack protocols. protocol-capabilities.txt describes multi-ack, thin-pack, side-band[-64k], shallow, no-progress, include-tag, ofs-delta, delete-refs and report-status. Signed-off-by: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			188 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			188 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| Git Protocol Capabilities
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Servers SHOULD support all capabilities defined in this document.
 | |
| 
 | |
| On the very first line of the initial server response of either
 | |
| receive-pack and upload-pack the first reference is followed by
 | |
| a NUL byte and then a list of space delimited server capabilities.
 | |
| These allow the server to declare what it can and cannot support
 | |
| to the client.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Client will then send a space separated list of capabilities it wants
 | |
| to be in effect. The client MUST NOT ask for capabilities the server
 | |
| did not say it supports.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Server MUST diagnose and abort if capabilities it does not understand
 | |
| was sent.  Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities that client requested
 | |
| and server advertised.  As a consequence of these rules, server MUST
 | |
| NOT advertise capabilities it does not understand.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The 'report-status' and 'delete-refs' capabilities are sent and
 | |
| recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The 'ofs-delta' capability is sent and recognized by both upload-pack
 | |
| and receive-pack protocols.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All other capabilities are only recognized by the upload-pack (fetch
 | |
| from server) process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| multi_ack
 | |
| ---------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The 'multi_ack' capability allows the server to return "ACK obj-id
 | |
| continue" as soon as it finds a commit that it can use as a common
 | |
| base, between the client's wants and the client's have set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| By sending this early, the server can potentially head off the client
 | |
| from walking any further down that particular branch of the client's
 | |
| repository history.  The client may still need to walk down other
 | |
| branches, sending have lines for those, until the server has a
 | |
| complete cut across the DAG, or the client has said "done".
 | |
| 
 | |
| Without multi_ack, a client sends have lines in --date-order until
 | |
| the server has found a common base.  That means the client will send
 | |
| have lines that are already known by the server to be common, because
 | |
| they overlap in time with another branch that the server hasn't found
 | |
| a common base on yet.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example suppose the client has commits in caps that the server
 | |
| doesn't and the server has commits in lower case that the client
 | |
| doesn't, as in the following diagram:
 | |
| 
 | |
|        +---- u ---------------------- x
 | |
|       /              +----- y
 | |
|      /              /
 | |
|     a -- b -- c -- d -- E -- F
 | |
|        \
 | |
| 	+--- Q -- R -- S
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the client wants x,y and starts out by saying have F,S, the server
 | |
| doesn't know what F,S is.  Eventually the client says "have d" and
 | |
| the server sends "ACK d continue" to let the client know to stop
 | |
| walking down that line (so don't send c-b-a), but its not done yet,
 | |
| it needs a base for x. The client keeps going with S-R-Q, until a
 | |
| gets reached, at which point the server has a clear base and it all
 | |
| ends.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Without multi_ack the client would have sent that c-b-a chain anyway,
 | |
| interleaved with S-R-Q.
 | |
| 
 | |
| thin-pack
 | |
| ---------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This capability means that the server can send a 'thin' pack, a pack
 | |
| which does not contain base objects; if those base objects are available
 | |
| on client side. Client requests 'thin-pack' capability when it
 | |
| understands how to "thicken" it by adding required delta bases making
 | |
| it self-contained.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Client MUST NOT request 'thin-pack' capability if it cannot turn a thin
 | |
| pack into a self-contained pack.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| side-band, side-band-64k
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This capability means that server can send, and client understand multiplexed
 | |
| progress reports and error info interleaved with the packfile itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These two options are mutually exclusive. A modern client always
 | |
| favors 'side-band-64k'.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Either mode indicates that the packfile data will be streamed broken
 | |
| up into packets of up to either 1000 bytes in the case of 'side_band',
 | |
| or 65520 bytes in the case of 'side_band_64k'. Each packet is made up
 | |
| of a leading 4-byte pkt-line length of how much data is in the packet,
 | |
| followed by a 1-byte stream code, followed by the actual data.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The stream code can be one of:
 | |
| 
 | |
|  1 - pack data
 | |
|  2 - progress messages
 | |
|  3 - fatal error message just before stream aborts
 | |
| 
 | |
| The "side-band-64k" capability came about as a way for newer clients
 | |
| that can handle much larger packets to request packets that are
 | |
| actually crammed nearly full, while maintaining backward compatibility
 | |
| for the older clients.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Further, with side-band and its up to 1000-byte messages, it's actually
 | |
| 999 bytes of payload and 1 byte for the stream code. With side-band-64k,
 | |
| same deal, you have up to 65519 bytes of data and 1 byte for the stream
 | |
| code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The client MUST send only maximum of one of "side-band" and "side-
 | |
| band-64k".  Server MUST diagnose it as an error if client requests
 | |
| both.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ofs-delta
 | |
| ---------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Server can send, and client understand PACKv2 with delta refering to
 | |
| its base by position in pack rather than by an obj-id.  That is, they can
 | |
| send/read OBJ_OFS_DELTA (aka type 6) in a packfile.
 | |
| 
 | |
| shallow
 | |
| -------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This capability adds "deepen", "shallow" and "unshallow" commands to
 | |
| the  fetch-pack/upload-pack protocol so clients can request shallow
 | |
| clones.
 | |
| 
 | |
| no-progress
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The client was started with "git clone -q" or something, and doesn't
 | |
| want that side band 2.  Basically the client just says "I do not
 | |
| wish to receive stream 2 on sideband, so do not send it to me, and if
 | |
| you did, I will drop it on the floor anyway".  However, the sideband
 | |
| channel 3 is still used for error responses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| include-tag
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The 'include-tag' capability is about sending annotated tags if we are
 | |
| sending objects they point to.  If we pack an object to the client, and
 | |
| a tag object points exactly at that object, we pack the tag object too.
 | |
| In general this allows a client to get all new annotated tags when it
 | |
| fetches a branch, in a single network connection.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Clients MAY always send include-tag, hardcoding it into a request when
 | |
| the server advertises this capability. The decision for a client to
 | |
| request include-tag only has to do with the client's desires for tag
 | |
| data, whether or not a server had advertised objects in the
 | |
| refs/tags/* namespace.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Servers MUST pack the tags if their referrant is packed and the client
 | |
| has requested include-tags.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Clients MUST be prepared for the case where a server has ignored
 | |
| include-tag and has not actually sent tags in the pack.  In such
 | |
| cases the client SHOULD issue a subsequent fetch to acquire the tags
 | |
| that include-tag would have otherwise given the client.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The server SHOULD send include-tag, if it supports it, regardless
 | |
| of whether or not there are tags available.
 | |
| 
 | |
| report-status
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The upload-pack process can receive a 'report-status' capability,
 | |
| which tells it that the client wants a report of what happened after
 | |
| a packfile upload and reference update.  If the pushing client requests
 | |
| this capability, after unpacking and updating references the server
 | |
| will respond with whether the packfile unpacked successfully and if
 | |
| each reference was updated successfully.  If any of those were not
 | |
| successful, it will send back an error message.  See pack-protocol.txt
 | |
| for example messages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| delete-refs
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the server sends back the 'delete-refs' capability, it means that
 | |
| it is capable of accepting an zero-id value as the target
 | |
| value of a reference update.  It is not sent back by the client, it
 | |
| simply informs the client that it can be sent zero-id values
 | |
| to delete references.
 |