git/t/t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh
Jeff King 6b145e016a branch: restrict @-expansions when deleting
We use strbuf_branchname() to expand the branch name from
the command line, so you can delete the branch given by
@{-1}, for example.  However, we allow other nonsense like
"@", and we do not respect our "-r" flag (so we may end up
deleting an oddly-named local ref instead of a remote one).

We can fix this by passing the appropriate "allowed" flag to
strbuf_branchname().

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-02 11:05:04 -08:00

124 lines
3.4 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/sh
test_description='interpreting exotic branch name arguments
Branch name arguments are usually names which are taken to be inside of
refs/heads/, but we interpret some magic syntax like @{-1}, @{upstream}, etc.
This script aims to check the behavior of those corner cases.
'
. ./test-lib.sh
expect_branch() {
git log -1 --format=%s "$1" >actual &&
echo "$2" >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
}
expect_deleted() {
test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify "$1"
}
test_expect_success 'set up repo' '
test_commit one &&
test_commit two &&
git remote add origin foo.git
'
test_expect_success 'update branch via @{-1}' '
git branch previous one &&
git checkout previous &&
git checkout master &&
git branch -f @{-1} two &&
expect_branch previous two
'
test_expect_success 'update branch via local @{upstream}' '
git branch local one &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=local &&
git branch -f @{upstream} two &&
expect_branch local two
'
test_expect_failure 'disallow updating branch via remote @{upstream}' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote one &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote &&
test_must_fail git branch -f @{upstream} two
'
test_expect_success 'create branch with pseudo-qualified name' '
git branch refs/heads/qualified two &&
expect_branch refs/heads/refs/heads/qualified two
'
test_expect_success 'delete branch via @{-1}' '
git branch previous-del &&
git checkout previous-del &&
git checkout master &&
git branch -D @{-1} &&
expect_deleted previous-del
'
test_expect_success 'delete branch via local @{upstream}' '
git branch local-del &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=local-del &&
git branch -D @{upstream} &&
expect_deleted local-del
'
test_expect_success 'delete branch via remote @{upstream}' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote-del two &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote-del &&
git branch -r -D @{upstream} &&
expect_deleted origin/remote-del
'
# Note that we create two oddly named local branches here. We want to make
# sure that we do not accidentally delete either of them, even if
# shorten_unambiguous_ref() tweaks the name to avoid ambiguity.
test_expect_success 'delete @{upstream} expansion matches -r option' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/remote-del two &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote-del &&
git update-ref refs/heads/origin/remote-del two &&
git update-ref refs/heads/remotes/origin/remote-del two &&
test_must_fail git branch -D @{upstream} &&
expect_branch refs/heads/origin/remote-del two &&
expect_branch refs/heads/remotes/origin/remote-del two
'
test_expect_success 'disallow deleting remote branch via @{-1}' '
git update-ref refs/remotes/origin/previous one &&
git checkout -b origin/previous two &&
git checkout master &&
test_must_fail git branch -r -D @{-1} &&
expect_branch refs/remotes/origin/previous one &&
expect_branch refs/heads/origin/previous two
'
# The thing we are testing here is that "@" is the real branch refs/heads/@,
# and not refs/heads/HEAD. These tests should not imply that refs/heads/@ is a
# sane thing, but it _is_ technically allowed for now. If we disallow it, these
# can be switched to test_must_fail.
test_expect_failure 'create branch named "@"' '
git branch -f @ one &&
expect_branch refs/heads/@ one
'
test_expect_success 'delete branch named "@"' '
git update-ref refs/heads/@ two &&
git branch -D @ &&
expect_deleted refs/heads/@
'
test_done