Tighten here-doc recognition to prevent it from being fooled by text
which looks like a here-doc operator but happens merely to be the
content of a string, such as this real-world case from t7201:
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
echo ourside &&
echo "=======" &&
echo theirside &&
echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
This problem went unnoticed because chainlint.sed is not a real parser,
but rather applies heuristics to pretend to understand shell code. In
this case, it saw what it thought was a here-doc operator (`<< ours`),
and fell off the end of the test looking for the closing tag "ours"
which it never found, thus swallowed the remainder of the test without
checking it for &&-chain breakage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
17 lines
319 B
Plaintext
17 lines
319 B
Plaintext
# LINT: "<< ours" inside string is not here-doc
|
|
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
|
|
echo ourside &&
|
|
echo "=======" &&
|
|
echo theirside &&
|
|
echo ">>>>>>> theirs" &&
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
# LINT: "<< ours" inside string is not here-doc
|
|
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
|
|
echo ourside &&
|
|
echo "=======" &&
|
|
echo theirside &&
|
|
echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
|
|
poodle
|
|
) >merged
|