 59ab4eb36e
			
		
	
	59ab4eb36e
	
	
	
		
			
			Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			76 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			76 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:17:40 -0500
 | |
| From: Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
 | |
| To: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
 | |
| Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
 | |
| Subject: how to use git merge -s subtree?
 | |
| Abstract: In this article, Sean demonstrates how one can use the subtree merge
 | |
|  strategy.
 | |
| Content-type: text/asciidoc
 | |
| Message-ID: <BAYC1-PASMTP12374B54BA370A1E1C6E78AE4E0@CEZ.ICE>
 | |
| 
 | |
| How to use the subtree merge strategy
 | |
| =====================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are situations where you want to include contents in your project
 | |
| from an independently developed project. You can just pull from the
 | |
| other project as long as there are no conflicting paths.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The problematic case is when there are conflicting files. Potential
 | |
| candidates are Makefiles and other standard filenames. You could merge
 | |
| these files but probably you do not want to.  A better solution for this
 | |
| problem can be to merge the project as its own subdirectory. This is not
 | |
| supported by the 'recursive' merge strategy, so just pulling won't work.
 | |
| 
 | |
| What you want is the 'subtree' merge strategy, which helps you in such a
 | |
| situation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, let's say you have the repository at `/path/to/B` (but
 | |
| it can be an URL as well, if you want). You want to merge the 'master'
 | |
| branch of that repository to the `dir-B` subdirectory in your current
 | |
| branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is the command sequence you need:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ----------------
 | |
| $ git remote add -f Bproject /path/to/B <1>
 | |
| $ git merge -s ours --no-commit Bproject/master <2>
 | |
| $ git read-tree --prefix=dir-B/ -u Bproject/master <3>
 | |
| $ git commit -m "Merge B project as our subdirectory" <4>
 | |
| 
 | |
| $ git pull -s subtree Bproject master <5>
 | |
| ----------------
 | |
| <1> name the other project "Bproject", and fetch.
 | |
| <2> prepare for the later step to record the result as a merge.
 | |
| <3> read "master" branch of Bproject to the subdirectory "dir-B".
 | |
| <4> record the merge result.
 | |
| <5> maintain the result with subsequent merges using "subtree"
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first four commands are used for the initial merge, while the last
 | |
| one is to merge updates from 'B project'.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Comparing 'subtree' merge with submodules
 | |
| -----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The benefit of using subtree merge is that it requires less
 | |
|   administrative burden from the users of your repository. It works with
 | |
|   older (before Git v1.5.2) clients and you have the code right after
 | |
|   clone.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - However if you use submodules then you can choose not to transfer the
 | |
|   submodule objects. This may be a problem with the subtree merge.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Also, in case you make changes to the other project, it is easier to
 | |
|   submit changes if you just use submodules.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Additional tips
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| - If you made changes to the other project in your repository, they may
 | |
|   want to merge from your project. This is possible using subtree -- it
 | |
|   can shift up the paths in your tree and then they can merge only the
 | |
|   relevant parts of your tree.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Please note that if the other project merges from you, then it will
 | |
|   connect its history to yours, which can be something they don't want
 | |
|   to.
 |