 6ccc71a9d0
			
		
	
	6ccc71a9d0
	
	
	
		
			
			The documentation says that --squash is for 'add', 'merge', 'pull' and 'push', while --squash actually doesn't change the behavior of 'push'. Correct the documentation. Signed-off-by: Danny Lin <danny0838@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			352 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			352 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| git-subtree(1)
 | |
| ==============
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAME
 | |
| ----
 | |
| git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| SYNOPSIS
 | |
| --------
 | |
| [verse]
 | |
| 'git subtree' add   -P <prefix> <commit>
 | |
| 'git subtree' add   -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
 | |
| 'git subtree' pull  -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
 | |
| 'git subtree' push  -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
 | |
| 'git subtree' merge -P <prefix> <commit>
 | |
| 'git subtree' split -P <prefix> [OPTIONS] [<commit>]
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| DESCRIPTION
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory
 | |
| of the main project, optionally including the subproject's
 | |
| entire history.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, you could include the source code for a library
 | |
| as a subdirectory of your application.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for
 | |
| the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special
 | |
| constructions (like .gitmodule files or gitlinks) be present in
 | |
| your repository, and do not force end-users of your
 | |
| repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees
 | |
| work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be
 | |
| committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in
 | |
| any way you want.
 | |
| 
 | |
| They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge
 | |
| strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging
 | |
| the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the
 | |
| entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it
 | |
| into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy
 | |
| you can alternate back and forth between these
 | |
| two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can
 | |
| automatically merge the changes into your project; if you
 | |
| update the library inside your project, you can "split" the
 | |
| changes back out again and merge them back into the library
 | |
| project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being
 | |
| useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish
 | |
| that as its own git repository, without accidentally
 | |
| intermingling the history of your application project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| [TIP]
 | |
| In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that
 | |
| people split their commits between the subtrees and the main
 | |
| project as much as possible.  That is, if you make a change that
 | |
| affects both the library and the main application, commit it in
 | |
| two pieces.  That way, when you split the library commits out
 | |
| later, their descriptions will still make sense.  But if this
 | |
| isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*.  git subtree will
 | |
| simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit
 | |
| when it splits it out into the subproject later.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| COMMANDS
 | |
| --------
 | |
| add::
 | |
| 	Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents
 | |
| 	from the given <commit> or <repository> and remote <ref>.
 | |
| 	A new commit is created	automatically, joining the imported
 | |
| 	project's history with your own.  With '--squash', imports
 | |
| 	only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its
 | |
| 	entire history.
 | |
| 
 | |
| merge::
 | |
| 	Merge recent changes up to <commit> into the <prefix>
 | |
| 	subtree.  As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't
 | |
| 	remove your own local changes; it just merges those
 | |
| 	changes into the latest <commit>.  With '--squash',
 | |
| 	creates only one commit that contains all the changes,
 | |
| 	rather than merging in the entire history.
 | |
| +
 | |
| If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't always have to be
 | |
| forward; you can use this command to go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4,
 | |
| for example.  If your merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in
 | |
| the usual ways.
 | |
| 	
 | |
| pull::
 | |
| 	Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that
 | |
| 	it fetches the given ref from the specified remote
 | |
| 	repository.
 | |
| 	
 | |
| push::
 | |
| 	Does a 'split' (see below) using the <prefix> supplied
 | |
| 	and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the 
 | |
| 	repository and ref. This can be used to push your
 | |
| 	subtree to different branches of the remote repository.
 | |
| 
 | |
| split::
 | |
| 	Extract a new, synthetic project history from the
 | |
| 	history of the <prefix> subtree.  The new history
 | |
| 	includes only the commits (including merges) that
 | |
| 	affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the
 | |
| 	contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead
 | |
| 	of in a subdirectory.  Thus, the newly created history
 | |
| 	is suitable for export as a separate git repository.
 | |
| +
 | |
| After splitting successfully, a single commit id is printed to stdout.
 | |
| This corresponds to the HEAD of the newly created tree, which you can
 | |
| manipulate however you want.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Repeated splits of exactly the same history are guaranteed to be
 | |
| identical (i.e. to produce the same commit ids).  Because of this, if
 | |
| you add new commits and then re-split, the new commits will be attached
 | |
| as commits on top of the history you generated last time, so 'git merge'
 | |
| and friends will work as expected.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Note that if you use '--squash' when you merge, you should usually not
 | |
| just '--rejoin' when you split.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| OPTIONS
 | |
| -------
 | |
| -q::
 | |
| --quiet::
 | |
| 	Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -d::
 | |
| --debug::
 | |
| 	Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -P <prefix>::
 | |
| --prefix=<prefix>::
 | |
| 	Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you
 | |
| 	want to manipulate.  This option is mandatory
 | |
| 	for all commands.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -m <message>::
 | |
| --message=<message>::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for add, merge and pull (unsure).
 | |
| 	Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| OPTIONS FOR add, merge, push, pull
 | |
| ----------------------------------
 | |
| --squash::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for add, merge, and pull
 | |
| 	commands.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree project, produce
 | |
| only a single commit that contains all the differences you want to
 | |
| merge, and then merge that new commit into your project.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People rarely want to see
 | |
| every change that happened between v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're
 | |
| using, since none of the interim versions were ever included in their
 | |
| application.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same subproject is
 | |
| included multiple times in the same project, or is removed and then
 | |
| re-added.  In such a case, it doesn't make sense to combine the
 | |
| histories anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history belongs
 | |
| to which subtree.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and forth between
 | |
| different versions of a subtree, rather than strictly forward.  'git
 | |
| subtree merge --squash' always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly
 | |
| specified commit, even if getting to that commit would require undoing
 | |
| some changes that were added earlier.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your local repository
 | |
| remain intact and can be later split and send upstream to the
 | |
| subproject.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| OPTIONS FOR split
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| --annotate=<annotation>::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for the split command.
 | |
| +
 | |
| When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a prefix to each
 | |
| commit message.  Since we're creating new commits with the same commit
 | |
| message, but possibly different content, from the original commits, this
 | |
| can help to differentiate them and avoid confusion.
 | |
| +
 | |
| Whenever you split, you need to use the same <annotation>, or else you
 | |
| don't have a guarantee that the new re-created history will be identical
 | |
| to the old one.  That will prevent merging from working correctly.  git
 | |
| subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly if you use --rejoin,
 | |
| but it may not always be effective.
 | |
| 
 | |
| -b <branch>::
 | |
| --branch=<branch>::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for the split command.
 | |
| +
 | |
| After generating the synthetic history, create a new branch called
 | |
| <branch> that contains the new history.  This is suitable for immediate
 | |
| pushing upstream.  <branch> must not already exist.
 | |
| 
 | |
| --ignore-joins::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for the split command.
 | |
| +
 | |
| If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize its history
 | |
| reconstruction to generate only the new commits since the last
 | |
| '--rejoin'.  '--ignore-join' disables this behaviour, forcing it to
 | |
| regenerate the entire history.  In a large project, this can take a long
 | |
| time.
 | |
| 
 | |
| --onto=<onto>::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for the split command.
 | |
| +
 | |
| If your subtree was originally imported using something other than git
 | |
| subtree, its history may not match what git subtree is expecting.  In
 | |
| that case, you can specify the commit id <onto> that corresponds to the
 | |
| first revision of the subproject's history that was imported into your
 | |
| project, and git subtree will attempt to build its history from there.
 | |
| +
 | |
| If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need this option.
 | |
| 
 | |
| --rejoin::
 | |
| 	This option is only valid for the split command.
 | |
| +
 | |
| After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic history back into
 | |
| your main project.  That way, future splits can search only the part of
 | |
| history that has been added since the most recent --rejoin.
 | |
| +
 | |
| If your split commits end up merged into the upstream subproject, and
 | |
| then you want to get the latest upstream version, this will allow git's
 | |
| merge algorithm to more intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows
 | |
| these synthetic commits are already part of the upstream repository).
 | |
| +
 | |
| Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' showing an extra
 | |
| copy of every new commit that was created (the original, and the
 | |
| synthetic one).
 | |
| +
 | |
| If you do all your merges with '--squash', don't use '--rejoin' when you
 | |
| split, because you don't want the subproject's history to be part of
 | |
| your project anyway.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| EXAMPLE 1. Add command
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like
 | |
| to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the
 | |
| git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing
 | |
| git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \
 | |
| 		git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master
 | |
| 
 | |
| 'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch
 | |
| name
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can omit the --squash flag, but doing so will increase the number
 | |
| of commits that are included in your local repository.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code
 | |
| from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git
 | |
| in our git-extensions repository.
 | |
| 
 | |
| EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using commit, merge and pull
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example.
 | |
| First, get your own copy of the git.git repository:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git
 | |
| 	$ cd test-git
 | |
| 
 | |
| gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit
 | |
| 0a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately. 
 | |
| But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to
 | |
| extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with
 | |
| the upstream.  You could do this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \
 | |
|         	0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \
 | |
|         	--branch gitweb-latest
 | |
|         $ gitk gitweb-latest
 | |
|         $ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master
 | |
|         
 | |
| (We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from
 | |
| 0a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.")
 | |
| 
 | |
| If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or
 | |
| a previous split had already been done with --rejoin specified)
 | |
| then you can do all your splits without having to remember any
 | |
| weird commit ids:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \
 | |
| 		--branch gitweb-latest2
 | |
| 
 | |
| And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just
 | |
| as easily:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \
 | |
| 		git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master
 | |
| 
 | |
| Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier
 | |
| version of gitweb:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then make some changes:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ date >gitweb/myfile
 | |
| 	$ git add gitweb/myfile
 | |
| 	$ git commit -m 'created myfile'
 | |
| 
 | |
| And fast forward again:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest
 | |
| 
 | |
| And notice that your change is still intact:
 | |
| 	
 | |
| 	$ ls -l gitweb/myfile
 | |
| 
 | |
| And you can split it out and look at your changes versus
 | |
| the standard gitweb:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb)
 | |
| 
 | |
| EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using branch
 | |
| -----------------------------------------
 | |
| Suppose you have a source directory with many files and
 | |
| subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own
 | |
| git project. Here's a short way to do it:
 | |
| 
 | |
| First, make the new repository wherever you want:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ <go to the new location>
 | |
| 	$ git init --bare
 | |
| 
 | |
| Back in your original directory:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	$ git push <new-repo> split:master
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| AUTHOR
 | |
| ------
 | |
| Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| GIT
 | |
| ---
 | |
| Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
 |