t-reftable-readwrite: use 'for' in place of infinite 'while' loops

Using a for loop with an empty conditional statement is more concise
and easier to read than an infinite 'while' loop in instances
where we need a loop variable. Hence, replace such instances of a
'while' loop with the equivalent 'for' loop.

Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Chandra Pratap
2024-08-13 20:04:49 +05:30
committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 3dd4fb13a0
commit 12f9ea473f

View File

@ -269,15 +269,13 @@ static void t_log_write_read(void)
err = reftable_iterator_seek_log(&it, "");
check(!err);
i = 0;
while (1) {
for (i = 0; ; i++) {
int err = reftable_iterator_next_log(&it, &log);
if (err > 0)
break;
check(!err);
check_str(names[i], log.refname);
check_int(i, ==, log.update_index);
i++;
reftable_log_record_release(&log);
}
@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ static void t_table_read_write_sequential(void)
err = reftable_iterator_seek_ref(&it, "");
check(!err);
while (1) {
for (j = 0; ; j++) {
struct reftable_ref_record ref = { 0 };
int r = reftable_iterator_next_ref(&it, &ref);
check_int(r, >=, 0);
@ -383,8 +381,6 @@ static void t_table_read_write_sequential(void)
break;
check_str(names[j], ref.refname);
check_int(update_index, ==, ref.update_index);
j++;
reftable_ref_record_release(&ref);
}
check_int(j, ==, N);
@ -590,15 +586,13 @@ static void t_table_refs_for(int indexed)
err = reftable_reader_refs_for(&rd, &it, want_hash);
check(!err);
j = 0;
while (1) {
for (j = 0; ; j++) {
int err = reftable_iterator_next_ref(&it, &ref);
check_int(err, >=, 0);
if (err > 0)
break;
check_int(j, <, want_names_len);
check_str(ref.refname, want_names[j]);
j++;
reftable_ref_record_release(&ref);
}
check_int(j, ==, want_names_len);