update-index: use unmerge_index_entry() to support removal

"update-index --unresolve" uses the unmerge_index_entry_at() that
assumes that the path to be unresolved must be in the index, which
makes it impossible to unresolve a path that was resolved as removal.

Rewrite unresolve_one() to use the unmerge_index_entry() to support
unresolving such a path.

Existing tests for "update-index --unresolve" forgot to check one
thing that tests for "checkout --merge -- paths" tested, which is to
make sure that resolve-undo record that has already been used to
recreate higher-stage index entries is removed.  Add new invocations
of "ls-files --resolve-undo" after running "update-index --unresolve"
to make sure that unresolving with update-index does remove the used
resolve-undo records.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2023-07-31 15:44:05 -07:00
parent fe83269e16
commit 35901f1c24
2 changed files with 55 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@ -660,26 +660,31 @@ static int unresolve_one(const char *path)
int pos;
int ret = 0;
struct cache_entry *ce_2 = NULL, *ce_3 = NULL;
struct resolve_undo_info *ru = NULL;
if (the_index.resolve_undo) {
struct string_list_item *item;
item = string_list_lookup(the_index.resolve_undo, path);
if (item) {
ru = item->util;
item->util = NULL;
}
}
/* resolve-undo record exists for the path */
if (ru) {
ret = unmerge_index_entry(&the_index, path, ru);
free(ru);
return ret;
}
/* See if there is such entry in the index. */
pos = index_name_pos(&the_index, path, namelen);
if (0 <= pos) {
/* already merged */
pos = unmerge_index_entry_at(&the_index, pos);
if (pos < the_index.cache_nr) {
const struct cache_entry *ce = the_index.cache[pos];
if (ce_stage(ce) &&
ce_namelen(ce) == namelen &&
!memcmp(ce->name, path, namelen))
return 0;
}
/* no resolve-undo information; fall back */
; /* resolve-undo record was used already -- fall back */
} else {
/* If there isn't, either it is unmerged, or
* resolved as "removed" by mistake. We do not
* want to do anything in the former case.
*/
pos = -pos-1;
/* Is it unmerged? */
pos = -pos - 1;
if (pos < the_index.cache_nr) {
const struct cache_entry *ce = the_index.cache[pos];
if (ce_namelen(ce) == namelen &&
@ -687,9 +692,10 @@ static int unresolve_one(const char *path)
fprintf(stderr,
"%s: skipping still unmerged path.\n",
path);
goto free_return;
}
goto free_return;
}
/* No, such a path does not exist -- removed */
}
/*

View File

@ -37,11 +37,17 @@ prime_resolve_undo () {
git checkout second^0 &&
test_tick &&
test_must_fail git merge third^0 &&
echo merge does not leave anything &&
check_resolve_undo empty &&
echo different >fi/le &&
git add fi/le &&
echo resolving records &&
# how should the conflict be resolved?
case "$1" in
remove)
rm -f file/le && git rm fi/le
;;
*) # modify
echo different >fi/le && git add fi/le
;;
esac
check_resolve_undo recorded fi/le initial:fi/le second:fi/le third:fi/le
}
@ -122,6 +128,8 @@ test_expect_success 'add records checkout -m undoes' '
test_expect_success 'unmerge with plumbing' '
prime_resolve_undo &&
git update-index --unresolve fi/le &&
git ls-files --resolve-undo fi/le >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
git ls-files -u >actual &&
test_line_count = 3 actual
'
@ -130,6 +138,27 @@ test_expect_success 'unmerge can be done even after committing' '
prime_resolve_undo &&
git commit -m "record to nuke MERGE_HEAD" &&
git update-index --unresolve fi/le &&
git ls-files --resolve-undo fi/le >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
git ls-files -u >actual &&
test_line_count = 3 actual
'
test_expect_success 'unmerge removal' '
prime_resolve_undo remove &&
git update-index --unresolve fi/le &&
git ls-files --resolve-undo fi/le >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
git ls-files -u >actual &&
test_line_count = 3 actual
'
test_expect_success 'unmerge removal after committing' '
prime_resolve_undo remove &&
git commit -m "record to nuke MERGE_HEAD" &&
git update-index --unresolve fi/le &&
git ls-files --resolve-undo fi/le >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
git ls-files -u >actual &&
test_line_count = 3 actual
'