Jeff King 637e8944a1 Revert "send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine"
This reverts commit b6049542b9.

Prior to that commit, we read the results of the user editing the
"--compose" message in a loop, picking out parts we cared about, and
streaming the result out to a ".final" file. That commit split the
reading/interpreting into two phases; we'd now read into a hash, and
then pick things out of the hash.

The goal was making the code more readable. And in some ways it did,
because the ugly regexes are confined to the reading phase. But it also
introduced several bugs, because now the two phases need to match each
other. In particular:

  - we pick out headers like "Subject: foo" with a case-insensitive
    regex, and then use the user-provided header name as the key in a
    case-sensitive hash. So if the user wrote "subject: foo", we'd no
    longer recognize it as a subject.

  - the namespace for the hash keys conflates header names with meta
    information like "body". If you put "body: foo" in your message, it
    would be misinterpreted as the actual message body (nobody is likely
    to do that in practice, but it seems like an unnecessary danger).

  - the handling for to/cc/bcc is totally broken. The behavior before
    that commit is to recognize and skip those headers, with a note to
    the user that they are not yet handled. Not great, but OK. But
    after the patch, the reading side now splits the addresses into a
    perl array-ref. But the interpreting side doesn't handle this at
    all, and blindly prints the stringified array-ref value. This leads
    to garbage like:

      (mbox) Adding to: ARRAY (0x555b4345c428) from line 'To: ARRAY(0x555b4345c428)'
      error: unable to extract a valid address from: ARRAY (0x555b4345c428)
      What to do with this address? ([q]uit|[d]rop|[e]dit):

    Probably not a huge deal, since nobody should even try to use those
    headers in the first place (since they were not implemented). But
    the new behavior is worse, and indicative of the sorts of problems
    that come from having the two layers.

The revert had a few conflicts, due to later work in this area from
15dc3b9161 (send-email: rename variable for clarity, 2018-03-04) and
d11c943c78 (send-email: support separate Reply-To address, 2018-03-04).
I've ported the changes from those commits over as part of the conflict
resolution.

The new tests show the bugs. Note the use of GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY in the
second one. Without it, the test is happy to reach outside the test
harness to the developer's actual terminal (when run with the buggy
state before this patch).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-20 14:31:32 -07:00
2023-06-03 10:35:13 +09:00
2023-07-06 11:54:48 -07:00
2023-04-24 12:47:33 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:48 -07:00
2023-07-25 12:05:24 -07:00
2023-04-24 12:47:33 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:48 -07:00
2023-04-10 08:46:40 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:48 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:46 -07:00
2023-07-25 12:05:24 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-04-24 22:31:32 -07:00
2023-04-17 21:15:56 +02:00
2023-08-21 09:34:58 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-07-24 16:11:23 -07:00
2023-07-24 16:11:23 -07:00
2023-04-17 21:15:44 +02:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-04-17 21:15:49 +02:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-06-21 13:39:54 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:48 -07:00
2023-07-06 11:54:46 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-07-18 14:47:30 -07:00
2023-06-12 13:49:36 -07:00
2023-07-25 12:05:24 -07:00
2023-06-13 12:29:46 -07:00
2023-08-04 10:52:30 -07:00
2023-07-25 12:05:24 -07:00
2023-07-25 12:05:24 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2022-12-01 18:38:07 +09:00
2023-03-17 14:03:09 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2023-06-28 14:06:39 -07:00
2022-12-13 21:09:40 +09:00
2022-12-13 21:09:40 +09:00
2023-04-04 14:28:27 -07:00
2023-05-17 10:11:41 -07:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).

Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).

To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org (not the Git list). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 235 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.3%
Python 0.8%
Other 2%