Jeff King 7b95849be4 attr: do not mark queried macros as unset
Since 60a12722ac (attr: remove maybe-real, maybe-macro from git_attr,
2017-01-27), we will always mark an attribute macro (e.g., "binary")
that is specifically queried for as "unspecified", even though listing
_all_ attributes would display it at set. E.g.:

  $ echo "* binary" >.gitattributes

  $ git check-attr -a file
  file: binary: set
  file: diff: unset
  file: merge: unset
  file: text: unset

  $ git check-attr binary file
  file: binary: unspecified

The problem stems from an incorrect conversion of the optimization from
06a604e670 (attr: avoid heavy work when we know the specified attr is
not defined, 2014-12-28). There we tried in collect_some_attrs() to
avoid even looking at the attr_stack when the user has asked for "foo"
and we know that "foo" did not ever appear in any .gitattributes file.

It used a flag "maybe_real" in each attribute struct, where "real" meant
that the attribute appeared in an actual file (we have to make this
distinction because we also create an attribute struct for any names
that are being queried). But as explained in that commit message, the
meaning of "real" was tangled with some special cases around macros.

When 60a12722ac later refactored the macro code, it dropped maybe_real
entirely. This missed the fact that "maybe_real" could be unset for two
reasons: because of a macro, or because it was never found during
parsing. This had two results:

  - the optimization in collect_some_attrs() ceased doing anything
    meaningful, since it no longer kept track of "was it found during
    parsing"

  - worse, it actually kicked in when the caller _did_ ask about a macro
    by name, causing us to mark it as unspecified

It should be possible to salvage this optimization, but let's start with
just removing the remnants. It hasn't been doing anything (except
creating bugs) since 60a12722ac, and nobody seems to have noticed the
performance regression. It's more important to fix the correctness
problem clearly first.

I've added two tests here. The second one actually shows off the bug.
The test of "check-attr -a" is not strictly necessary, but we currently
do not test attribute macros much, and the builtin "binary" not at all.
So this increases our general test coverage, as well as making sure we
didn't mess up this related case.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-22 13:48:15 -08:00
2018-11-21 23:22:12 +09:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-09-12 15:15:34 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-10-24 10:25:12 +09:00
2018-08-20 11:33:50 -07:00
2018-11-21 23:22:12 +09:00
2018-08-20 11:33:53 -07:00
2018-08-20 11:33:50 -07:00
2018-08-02 15:30:44 -07:00
2018-08-02 15:30:44 -07:00
2018-08-02 15:30:45 -07:00
2018-08-15 15:08:23 -07:00
2018-08-15 15:08:23 -07:00
2018-11-21 23:22:12 +09:00
2018-08-15 15:08:25 -07:00
2018-09-27 11:50:45 -07:00
2018-08-15 11:52:09 -07:00
2018-08-15 15:08:25 -07:00
2018-08-20 12:41:32 -07:00
2018-09-12 15:15:34 -07:00

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 235 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.3%
Python 0.8%
Other 2%