7f09cfafa8acf507f3a1358e05002e566f41783f

When we shove a large number of files at update-index and they have very short path names we are likely going to fit a large number of them into the pipe buffer very early; thereby seeing a huge progress update followed by lots of waiting between progress updates due to the latency of update-index. Using a smaller buffer should help smooth out the progress updates as we are better able to keep tabs on the update-index process' progress through our list of paths. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Description
No description provided
Languages
C
50.1%
Shell
38.4%
Perl
5.1%
Tcl
3.3%
Python
0.8%
Other
2%