8b95521edb
In79862b6b77(bundle-create: progress output control, 2019-11-10), "bundle create" learned about the --all-progress and --all-progress-implied options, which were copied from pack-objects. I think these were a mistake. In pack-objects, "all-progress-implied" is about switching the behavior between a regular on-disk "git repack" and the use of pack-objects for push/fetch (where a fetch does not want progress from the server during the write stage; the client will print progress as it receives the data). But there's no such distinction for bundles. Prior to79862b6b77, we always printed the write stage. Afterwards, a vanilla: git bundle create foo.bundle omits the write progress, appearing to hang (especially if your repository is large or your disk is slow). That seems like a regression. It's possible that the flexibility to disable the write-phase progress _could_ be useful for bundle. E.g., if you did something like: ssh some-host git bundle create foo.bundle | git bundle unbundle But if you are running both in real-time, why are you using bundles in the first place? You're better off doing a real fetch. But even if we did want to support that, it should be the exception, and vanilla "bundle create" should display the full progress. So we'd want to name the option "--no-write-progress" or something. The "--all-progress" option itself is even worse. It exists in pack-objects only for historical reasons. It's a mistake because it implies "--progress", and we added "--all-progress-implied" to fix that. There is no reason to propagate that mistake to new commands. Likewise, the documentation for these options was pulled from pack-objects. But it doesn't make any sense in this context. It talks about "--stdout", but that is not even an option that git-bundle supports. This patch flips the default for "--all-progress-implied" back to "true", fixing the regression in79862b6b77. This turns that option into a noop, and means that "--all-progress" is really the same as "--progress". We _could_ drop them completely, but since they've been shipped with Git since v2.25.0, it's polite to continue accepting them. I didn't implement any sort of "--no-write-progress" here. I'm not at all convinced it's necessary, and the discussion from the original thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20191110204126.30553-2-robbat2@gentoo.org/ shows that that the main focus was on getting --progress and --quiet support, and not any kind of clever "real-time bundle over the network" feature. But technically this patch is making it impossible to do something that you _could_ do post-79862b6b77c. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message
string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md
(a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org (not the Git list). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks