8ec617c80c
When locking references in preparation for updating them, we need to
check that none of the newly added references D/F conflict with
existing references (e.g., we don't allow `refs/foo` to be added if
`refs/foo/bar` already exists, or vice versa).
Prior to 524a9fdb51 (refs_verify_refname_available(): use function in
more places, 2017-04-16), conflicts with existing loose references
were checked by looking directly in the filesystem, and then conflicts
with existing packed references were checked by running
`verify_refname_available_dir()` against the packed-refs cache.
But that commit changed the final check to call
`refs_verify_refname_available()` against the *whole* files ref-store,
including both loose and packed references, with the following
comment:
> This means that those callsites now check for conflicts with all
> references rather than just packed refs, but the performance cost
> shouldn't be significant (and will be regained later).
That comment turned out to be too sanguine. User s@kazlauskas.me
reported that fetches involving a very large number of references in
neighboring directories were slowed down by that change.
The problem is that when fetching, each reference is updated
individually, within its own reference transaction. This is done
because some reference updates might succeed even though others fail.
But every time a reference update transaction is finished,
`clear_loose_ref_cache()` is called. So when it is time to update the
next reference, part of the loose ref cache has to be repopulated for
the `refs_verify_refname_available()` call. If the references are all
in neighboring directories, then the cost of repopulating the
reference cache increases with the number of references, resulting in
O(N²) effort.
The comment above also claims that the performance cost "will be
regained later". The idea was that once the packed-refs were finished
being split out into a separate ref-store, we could limit the
`refs_verify_refname_available()` call to the packed references again.
That is what we do now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks