Elijah Newren 9df53c5de6 Recommend git-filter-repo instead of git-filter-branch
filter-branch suffers from a deluge of disguised dangers that disfigure
history rewrites (i.e. deviate from the deliberate changes).  Many of
these problems are unobtrusive and can easily go undiscovered until the
new repository is in use.  This can result in problems ranging from an
even messier history than what led folks to filter-branch in the first
place, to data loss or corruption.  These issues cannot be backward
compatibly fixed, so add a warning to both filter-branch and its manpage
recommending that another tool (such as filter-repo) be used instead.

Also, update other manpages that referenced filter-branch.  Several of
these needed updates even if we could continue recommending
filter-branch, either due to implying that something was unique to
filter-branch when it applied more generally to all history rewriting
tools (e.g. BFG, reposurgeon, fast-import, filter-repo), or because
something about filter-branch was used as an example despite other more
commonly known examples now existing.  Reword these sections to fix
these issues and to avoid recommending filter-branch.

Finally, remove the section explaining BFG Repo Cleaner as an
alternative to filter-branch.  I feel somewhat bad about this,
especially since I feel like I learned so much from BFG that I put to
good use in filter-repo (which is much more than I can say for
filter-branch), but keeping that section presented a few problems:
  * In order to recommend that people quit using filter-branch, we need
    to provide them a recomendation for something else to use that
    can handle all the same types of rewrites.  To my knowledge,
    filter-repo is the only such tool.  So it needs to be mentioned.
  * I don't want to give conflicting recommendations to users
  * If we recommend two tools, we shouldn't expect users to learn both
    and pick which one to use; we should explain which problems one
    can solve that the other can't or when one is much faster than
    the other.
  * BFG and filter-repo have similar performance
  * All filtering types that BFG can do, filter-repo can also do.  In
    fact, filter-repo comes with a reimplementation of BFG named
    bfg-ish which provides the same user-interface as BFG but with
    several bugfixes and new features that are hard to implement in
    BFG due to its technical underpinnings.
While I could still mention both tools, it seems like I would need to
provide some kind of comparison and I would ultimately just say that
filter-repo can do everything BFG can, so ultimately it seems that it
is just better to remove that section altogether.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-05 13:01:48 -07:00
2019-07-29 12:39:13 -07:00
2019-08-22 12:34:11 -07:00
2019-04-01 11:57:39 +09:00
2019-04-01 11:57:39 +09:00
2019-05-14 16:45:01 +09:00
2019-05-30 10:50:45 -07:00
2019-08-02 13:12:02 -07:00
2019-01-02 10:19:05 -08:00
2019-07-19 11:30:21 -07:00
2019-07-19 11:30:20 -07:00
2019-07-09 15:25:44 -07:00
2019-07-09 15:25:44 -07:00
2019-07-25 13:59:20 -07:00
2019-07-09 15:25:43 -07:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-07-09 15:25:43 -07:00
2019-05-13 23:50:32 +09:00
2019-07-19 11:30:20 -07:00
2019-07-25 13:59:20 -07:00
2019-08-22 12:41:04 -07:00
2019-08-02 13:12:02 -07:00
2019-06-13 13:19:42 -07:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-04-22 11:14:43 +09:00
2019-08-02 13:12:02 -07:00
2019-01-14 12:13:04 -08:00
2019-06-11 10:34:40 -07:00
2019-07-09 15:25:43 -07:00
2019-07-19 11:30:19 -07:00
2019-07-19 11:30:20 -07:00
2019-07-19 11:30:20 -07:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-02-06 22:05:23 -08:00
2019-06-17 18:15:04 -07:00
2019-02-05 14:26:09 -08:00
2019-07-11 15:16:49 -07:00
2018-12-09 12:37:32 +09:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-04-01 11:57:39 +09:00
2019-08-22 12:41:04 -07:00
2019-01-14 12:13:04 -08:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-02-05 14:26:11 -08:00
2018-12-09 12:37:32 +09:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-05-13 23:50:35 +09:00
2019-05-05 15:20:10 +09:00
2019-06-21 11:24:08 -07:00

Build Status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 235 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.3%
Python 0.8%
Other 2%