Jeff King b01d650a93 fast-export: allow dumping the refname mapping
After you anonymize a repository, it can be hard to find which commits
correspond between the original and the result, and thus hard to
reproduce commands that triggered bugs in the original.

Let's make it possible to dump the mapping separate from the output
stream. This can be used by a bug reporter to modify their reproduction
recipe without revealing the original names (see the example in the
documentation).

The implementation is slightly non-obvious. There's no point in the
program where we know the complete set of refs we're going to anonymize.
Nor do we have a complete set of anonymized refs after finishing (we
have a set of anonymized ref path components, but no knowledge of how
those are assembled into complete refs). So we lazily write to the dump
file as we anonymize each name, and keep a list of ones that we've
output in order to avoid duplicates.

Some possible alternatives:

  - we could just output the mapping of anonymized components (e.g.,
    that "foo" became "ref123"). That works OK when you have short
    refnames (e.g., "refs/heads/foo" becomes "refs/heads/ref123"), but
    longer names would require the user to look up each component to
    assemble the result. For example, "refs/remotes/origin/jk/foo" might
    become "refs/remotes/refs37/refs56/refs102".

  - instead of dumping the mapping, the same problem could be solved by
    allowing the user to leave some refs alone. So if you want to
    reproduce "git rev-list branch~17..HEAD" in the anonymized repo, we
    could allow something like:

      git tag anon-one branch
      git tag anon-two HEAD
      git fast-export --anonymize --all \
                      --no-anonymize-ref=anon-one \
		      --no-anonymize-ref=anon-two \
		      >stream

    and then presumably "git rev-list anon-one~17..anon-two" would
    behave the same in the re-imported repository. This is more
    convenient in some ways, but it does require modifying the
    original repository. And the concept doesn't easily extend to
    other fields (e.g., pathnames, which will be addressed in a
    subsequent patch).

  - we could dump before/after commit hashes; combined with rev-parse,
    that could convert these cases (as well as ones using raw hashes).
    But we don't actually know the anonymized commit hashes; we're just
    generating a stream that will produce them in the anonymized repo.

  - likewise, we probably could insert object names or other markers
    into commit messages, blob contents, etc, in order to let a user
    with the original repo figure out which parts correspond. But using
    this gets complicated (I have to find my commits in the result with
    "git log --all --grep" or similar). It also makes it less clear that
    the anonymized repo didn't leak any information (because we are
    relying on object ids being unguessable).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-19 12:20:49 -07:00
2020-03-05 10:43:04 -08:00
2020-03-21 18:26:56 +08:00
2019-12-01 09:04:35 -08:00
2020-03-05 10:43:02 -08:00
2019-11-20 13:29:02 +09:00
2019-11-18 15:21:28 +09:00
2019-11-18 15:21:28 +09:00
2020-02-19 09:37:15 -08:00
2020-02-19 09:37:15 -08:00
2019-12-25 11:21:58 -08:00
2020-02-17 13:22:17 -08:00
2019-12-06 16:31:39 +01:00
2019-12-01 09:04:36 -08:00
2019-12-06 16:31:39 +01:00
2020-04-19 16:32:24 -07:00
2020-03-25 13:07:47 -07:00
2019-11-10 16:00:54 +09:00
2019-12-16 13:08:39 -08:00
2020-03-05 10:43:02 -08:00
2019-12-25 11:21:58 -08:00
2019-12-25 11:21:58 -08:00
2019-12-06 16:31:39 +01:00
2020-04-19 16:31:07 -07:00
2019-12-09 22:17:55 -08:00
2020-04-19 16:32:24 -07:00
2020-01-15 12:14:51 -08:00
2019-11-18 15:21:28 +09:00
2019-11-10 16:00:54 +09:00
2019-12-01 09:04:35 -08:00
2019-11-13 10:09:10 +09:00
2020-04-19 16:32:24 -07:00
2019-11-18 15:21:28 +09:00
2020-03-02 15:07:20 -08:00
2019-12-01 09:04:35 -08:00
2019-12-16 13:08:39 -08:00
2019-12-02 08:48:56 -08:00
2020-02-17 13:22:17 -08:00
2019-11-27 10:57:10 +09:00
2019-11-18 15:21:28 +09:00
2020-04-19 16:32:24 -07:00
2019-11-10 16:00:54 +09:00
2020-03-02 15:07:19 -08:00
2019-11-13 10:09:10 +09:00
2019-11-18 15:21:29 +09:00
2020-03-05 10:43:02 -08:00
2019-12-06 16:31:30 +01:00
2019-11-18 15:21:29 +09:00
2019-11-18 15:21:29 +09:00
2019-11-10 16:00:54 +09:00
2019-12-25 11:21:59 -08:00

Build Status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 235 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.3%
Python 0.8%
Other 2%