Jeff King e9de7a52a5 t5516: don't use HEAD ref for invalid ref-deletion tests
A few tests in t5516 want to assert that we can delete a corrupted ref
whose pointed-to object is missing. They do so by using the "main"
branch, which is also pointed to by HEAD.

This does work, but only because of a subtle assumption about the
implementation. We do not block the deletion because of the invalid ref,
but we _also_ do not notice that the deleted branch is pointed to by
HEAD. And so the safety rule of "do not allow HEAD to be deleted in a
non-bare repository" does not kick in, and the test passes.

Let's instead use a non-HEAD branch. That still tests what we care about
here (deleting a corrupt ref), but without implicitly depending on our
failure to notice that we're deleting HEAD. That will future proof the
test against that behavior changing.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-27 12:36:44 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:39 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:45:03 -07:00
2021-07-22 13:05:54 -07:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-08-12 14:00:52 -07:00
2021-05-10 16:59:47 +09:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-05-07 12:47:41 +09:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:39 -07:00
2021-09-09 15:49:04 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-08-24 15:33:23 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:28 -07:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-07-28 13:17:58 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:40 -07:00
2021-08-24 15:32:37 -07:00
2021-07-26 12:01:26 -07:00
2021-08-24 15:33:23 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:30 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-07-28 13:17:59 -07:00
2021-07-22 13:35:20 -07:00
2021-07-22 13:35:20 -07:00
2021-05-04 12:09:43 +09:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:27 -07:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 235 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.3%
Python 0.8%
Other 2%